We are using Opensips as a dispatcher to Asterisk servers. The call flow for
incoming calls to UAC is below (outbound is reversed).
telco -> opensips1 -> asterisk -> opensips1 -> UAC (SIP phones)
We are at the planning stages of implementing TLS. Asterisk (1.8.x), Opensips
(1.7.1 TLS) and th
Thanks for the tip!
It seems that you're reading my mind - because that's exactly what's needed!
2015-08-21 19:02 GMT+03:00 Bogdan-Andrei Iancu :
> Hi Peter,
>
> Well, you do not want to drop the reply, but to replace it guess, right ?
>
> If so, you can use a failure route and do:
>
> failure_rou
Yes, it works until the character <=> because it does not contains the <">
The body should looks like...
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org]
Im Auftrag von Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Gesendet: Freitag, 21. August 2015 16:36
The log doesn't show any errors when the Timeout occurs, it only shows this:
opensips[1842]: ACC: call missed:
> timestamp=1440174643;method=INVITE;from_tag=z9hG4bK04147190;to_tag=;call_id=
> 424618310389@10.137.181.237;code=408;reason=Request Timeout
>
This seems to occur sporadically; some cal
Sorry to bring this up again, but I still get the 408 Request Timeout on
some calls.
Isn't there just a way to increase the request timeout limit?
Here is the trace:
http://pastebin.com/jvCPGYDu
There is even an ACK in the trace after the request timeout message, but
the call doesn't connect.
Hi Peter,
Well, you do not want to drop the reply, but to replace it guess, right ?
If so, you can use a failure route and do:
failure_route[bla] {
if (t_check_status([3][0-9][0-9]) {
t_reply("404","Not found");
exit;
}
}
This will replace all 3xx you get with a 404 Not
Hello All!
Sorry for the dumb question. I'm aware that it's possible to drop
provisional replies using drop() in onreply_route. Is there a way to
drop non-provisional ones?
I'm trying to block some 3xx and 4xx replies completely. I could do it
with my custom B2BUA but maybe OpenSIPS could do this
Ralf,
You have a trailing <"> at the end of the command:
try
/usr/local/opensips_proxy/sbin/opensipsctl fifo t_uac_dlg NOTIFY
"sip:3003@193.144.1.112" . . "\"From: sip:3001@192.180.1.107\r\nTo:
sip:3003@193.144.1.112\r\nContent-Type: application/simservs+xml\r\n"\"
'
Instead of:
/usr/local/o
/usr/local/opensips_proxy/sbin/opensipsctl fifo t_uac_dlg NOTIFY
"sip:3003@193.144.1.112" . . "\"From: sip:3001@192.180.1.107\r\nTo:
sip:3003@193.144.1.112\r\nContent-Type: application/simservs+xml\r\n"\" '
An: "OpenSIPS users mailling list" ,
ralf_neumann_...@web.de
Betreff: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users
Denis,
Sowhat you want to do is to be able to serial and parallel (combined)
having carriers as elements in the list (and not GWs).
With the solution I gave you cannot do it as you cannot usecarriers in
the definition of another carrier(when doing the parallel group), right ?
Regards,
Bogd
No, Bogdan, everything fine. You wright understand my question.
I wanted "do a combination between serial and parallel selection" but method
you suggest doesn`t fit to me.
The main reason I have many providers and using carrier for "sharing"
doesn`t convenient, because I must have all possible co
Denis,
I had the impression that I haven't managed to answer to your question.
Maybe because I do not fully understand the question. Could you detail
why the solutionI gave doesnot fit you?
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 21.0
Just a quick thank you for the great points on extension status monitoring.
JK
From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of SamyGo
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 11:58 AM
To: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Cc: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Subject: Re:
Hello Bogdan!
I understand and I thought about it before. But it doesn`t fit to me,
because I have many prefix which can "sharing" different carriers.
Anyway, thank you for help.
From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:bog...@opensips.org]
Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 3:29 PM
To: OpenSIPS u
Hi Denis,
If you use weights alg and the GW has no weight, a 0 weight will be
assumed, so it will never match (unless after a failover).
Using weights, the selection is over all the GW in the set.
If you want do a combination between serial and parallel selection , you
need to use carriers:
Hi Ralf,
Could you post the exact command (from shell) you send together with the
opensips error log please.
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 21.08.2015 09:59, Ralf Neumann wrote:
not caused by the syntax. The command accept th
Hello!
There is one question about dr_routing module.
Example 1.
I have such gw_list "#14,#34=50,#35=50,#2881"
Example 2.
I have such gw_list "#14,#34,#35,#2881"
I am using d_routing() with W flag.
In Example 1 a call first had been sent to sharing between #34 and #35 and
only
not caused by the syntax. The command accept the following syntax:
'
An: "OpenSIPS users mailling list"
Betreff: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] fifo t_uac_dlg syntax
are u sure about the syntax errors not caused by your shell?
On Aug 20, 2015 11:10 AM, "Ralf_Neumann_hgw" wrote:Hi
Bogdan,
the NOTIFY is u
18 matches
Mail list logo
