[OpenSIPS-Users] ERROR:core:tcp_connect_blocking: timeout

2015-10-23 Thread Nabeel
Hi, On some calls, I'm getting this timeout error in the OpenSIPS log even when the call successfully connects and the other phone rings. How can it be avoided? INFO:core:init_sock_keepalive: TCP keepalive enabled on socket 25 > ERROR:core:tcp_connect_blocking: timeout 99231 ms elapsed from 1000

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] [Public Meeting] September's followup

2015-10-23 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Hurry. :) Now that we know what to do, we will start planning the work. Most probably a 3.x branch will be created to host the scripting changes. But I will keep you all posted with the strategy and the progress. Thank for your input ! Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Develop

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] [Public Meeting] September's followup

2015-10-23 Thread Răzvan Crainea
Hello! Thank you all for voting the new OpenSIPS scripting language! According to your picks[3], 57% (30) of you were in favor of the first version, and 43% (23) liked more the second version (the ini-like one). Therefore, I am glad to announce that the winner is the first version - re-structur

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips change the order of requests

2015-10-23 Thread Patrick Wakano
Very well pointed Vlad!! I found a way to prevent Asterisk of sending the UPDATE at all. I think I will stick with that! It has only caused trouble Thank you very much! Patrick On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Vlad Paiu wrote: > Hello, > > I would say this an UA issue - OpenSIPS does not

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips change the order of requests

2015-10-23 Thread Vlad Paiu
Hello, I would say this an UA issue - OpenSIPS does not do any enforcing on the order of outgoing SIP packets, so if the UA sends an INVITE immediately followed by an UPDATE, there exists the risk of the UPDATE reaching the endpoint first ( even if the proxy would maintain the the packet order