[OpenSIPS-Users] correct usage of the remove function in registrar module

2015-11-23 Thread Jayesh Nambiar
Hi, Can someone please confirm if remove function in registrar module works as expected. If my UL SHOW shows this, what shouldbe used to remove this particular contact only form the location: ecef74d17522a634b0412c at abc.com Contact:: sip:ecef74d17522a634b0412c at 11.22.33.44:54332;rinstance=ca991

[OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips fails to ESTABLISH TLS for non-slandered Secure SIP port

2015-11-23 Thread Ravitez Ravi
*Hello All,* OpenSIPS fails to establish TLS connection with far end which is listening to non-standard secure SIP port (i.e., far end listening on port other than 5061). *Setup details:* TLS client: OpenSIPS 1.11.5 running on RHEL 6.5 TLS client listen port: 5061 TLS client IP: 10.204

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] REG::TLS connection to non 5061 port

2015-11-23 Thread Ali Ariyayi
hi  i want change tu, for example i recieve one number and now chenge this number. what can i do on opensips ? On Monday, November 23, 2015 10:09 PM, Ravitez Ravi wrote: Hello All,            When a TLS request is sent to a non standard sip port opensips does not initiate "client hell

[OpenSIPS-Users] REG::TLS connection to non 5061 port

2015-11-23 Thread Ravitez Ravi
Hello All, When a TLS request is sent to a non standard sip port opensips does not initiate "client hello" Logs : ERROR:core:tls_connect: SSL_ERROR_SYSCALL err=Success(0) ERROR:core:tls_connect: New TLS connection to 1.2.3.4:5062 failed (example ip) ERROR:core:tls_connect: TLS error

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips 2.2 compile problem

2015-11-23 Thread Răzvan Crainea
From your previous output, I noticed you are using the DBG_F_MALLOC, which is obsoleted. Can you use DBG_QM_MALLOC instead? BR Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com On 11/18/2015 01:39 PM, Dragomir Haralambiev wrote: Here results with new git pull: make all ... Comp

[OpenSIPS-Users] OpenSIPS as a B2B with media behind NAT

2015-11-23 Thread Igor Olhovskiy
Hi! I'm trying to implement a solution like this. WAN - Firewall(NAT) - OpenSIPS(w. rtpproxy (2.0)) - Freeswitch'es Main idea. Hide all internal network topology to make all endpoints to work like "on single WAN address" All endpoints are on FreeSwitch'es. On a Firewall there is port forwarding

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Hash in the uac_registrant module

2015-11-23 Thread Ovidiu Sas
Please open a feature request for this. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Nov 6, 2015 07:02, "Alexander Mustafin" wrote: > Hello. > > Is it possible to use hash of passwords in uac_registrant table? It isn’t > very secure to keep plain passwords. > > Best regards, > Alexander Mustafin > mustafin.aleksa...@

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Try to setup ENUM NRENUM support...

2015-11-23 Thread Stefano Pisani
Ciao Michele, per uscire con il contact corretto devi usare l'advertised_address / advertised_port se il serves ha solo un IP interno. Questo fa nascere vari problemi perché la correzione viene fatta anche per verso i client interni. Non c'è il concetto di Lan come per asterisk, almeno finora.

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] No Timeout socket information in Create/Update session Request

2015-11-23 Thread Hamid Hashmi
Its working for [root@sip-server ~]# opensipsctl fifo version Server:: OpenSIPS (1.9.2-notls (x86_64/linux)) RTPproxy log for Create/Update Request received command "955_7 USEERX.X.X.Xc8,18,108,102,0,4,116 B2B.7.7189565 X.X.X.X 39282 af08fa854f3dc22d9d891b256b3b1da2;1 ;1 127.0.0.1:2 3373.57

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Security related

2015-11-23 Thread Răzvan Crainea
Hi, John! 1. No, it is not taken care by the module internally. 2. opensipsctl is run only locally, so I don't think you have to worry about that. On the other side, mi_datagram communicates plain-text over the internet, so I understand your worries. However, there's not that much you can do