Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Topology Hiding Usage Question

Hi Nathaniel, When you do topology hiding, from SIP routing perspective, OpenSIPS will act as an end-point and not as a proxy. So, if you do TH, makes no sense to do record_route and loose_route and they are specific to proxy routing. So, 1) no 2) what you mean "hide" ? to be replied from

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Radius Async

Hello, Problem with radius still exists. Any idea? Regards, Dragomir 2016-02-05 18:58 GMT+02:00 Dragomir Haralambiev : > Now my Makefile begin with follow lines: > > ifeq ("$(FREERADIUS)", "") > ifneq ("$(wildcard /usr/include/freeradius-client.h)","") > FREERADIUS=1 >

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Call-id issue in Cancel message generated by tm / $T_fr_inv_timeout

Hi Julian, I will have to test this and come back to you. Regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer http://www.opensips-solutions.com On 10.02.2016 17:45, Julian Santer wrote: Hi guys, we seem to got the same issue like John Nash on 2015/08/12. We use OpenSips 2.1.2 with

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] [BOOK] Building Telephony Systems with OpenSIPS - 2.1 version

Hi Schneur, OK, I will check with the editor if they can push fixes to the book. Thanks for reporting it! Thanks and Regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer http://www.opensips-solutions.com On 09.02.2016 13:20, Schneur Rosenberg wrote: Chapter 1, page 11 (page 36 of

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] PJSIP example configuration not working

Hi Mateusz, May I ask what is the connection of your question with OpenSIPS ? Regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer http://www.opensips-solutions.com On 09.02.2016 15:30, Mateusz Kowalski wrote: Hello, My problem is having Asterisk with PJSIP realtime (configured as

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] How to TLS ?

Nabeel I dont know how to present a certificate from client. I have tried using Xoiper (Android - Free), SFLphone (Ubuntu) and CsipSimple (Android) but there was no options set a public key. Now I am using CA signed certificates in opensips with disabled flags of verify_cert and require_cert,

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Call-id issue in Cancel message generated by tm / $T_fr_inv_timeout

Hi Bogdan, thank you for your time. If you need further informations (config files etc.) let me know. Kind regards, Julian Santer Raiffeisen OnLine Am 11.02.2016 um 10:26 schrieb Bogdan-Andrei Iancu: Hi Julian, I will have to test this and come back to you. Regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Call-id issue in Cancel message generated by tm / $T_fr_inv_timeout

Julian, Please update from GIT repo and give it a new try. It should work now (at least it does for me). Regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer http://www.opensips-solutions.com On 11.02.2016 12:07, Julian Santer wrote: Hi Bogdan, thank you for your time. If you need

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Call-id issue in Cancel message generated by tm / $T_fr_inv_timeout

Bogdan, we tried now the latest GIT release and it works like a charm ;-) Thank you for quick fix. Kind regards, Julian Santer Raiffeisen OnLine Am 11.02.2016 um 14:02 schrieb Bogdan-Andrei Iancu: Julian, Please update from GIT repo and give it a new try. It should work now (at least it

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] A doubt on count of child processes, children parameter in cfg.

Hint: Do you listen on more then one ip or proto? On Feb 11, 2016 7:44 PM, "surya" wrote: > Hi, > > My understanding about the *children* parameter in the cfg file is that the > same number of child process will be created. For ex: if I write > *children=1* only 1

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] A doubt on count of child processes, children parameter in cfg.

Hi, The command 'opensipsctl ps' should clear this up. e.g. in my case, with children=8, [root@sip ~]# opensipsctl ps Process:: ID=0 PID=743932 Type=attendant Process:: ID=1 PID=743933 Type=MI FIFO Process:: ID=2 PID=743934 Type=time_keeper Process:: ID=3 PID=743935 Type=timer Process::

[OpenSIPS-Users] A doubt on count of child processes, children parameter in cfg.

Hi, My understanding about the *children* parameter in the cfg file is that the same number of child process will be created. For ex: if I write *children=1* only 1 child will be created and all the requests will be handled by same child. Please correct me if I am wrong. But, when I start the

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] A doubt on count of child processes, children parameter in cfg.

Hi Aron, Thanks for the reply. I am just using UDP but with your hint, I rechecked the CFG and disabled the tcp, set *disable_tcp=yes* and there are 4 child. I am listening on single IP(I don't know how to do on multiple). :) Thanks, Surya -- View this message in context:

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Lots of presence:p_tm_callback, 408 warning

Hi Bogdan, Thanks. There must be a queue for the incoming requests though. Can you redirect me to the code which queues the requests? I tried to look through the codes but it's difficult. Basically, I want to check how much time request spend in the queue and calculate the response time for

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] A doubt on count of child processes, children parameter in cfg.

I am not opensips expert, therefore, my understanding may not be correct but when I see the log, I see the 4 child init and the print statements from the child_init() method 4 times. But, let me also clear some more things, I have modified the code to use redis cache and I have put the create

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] A doubt on count of child processes, children parameter in cfg.

On 02/11/2016 08:50 PM, surya wrote: I am facing some performance issues that's why I was thinking about those. Performance issues of what nature? -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC 303 Perimeter Center North, Suite 300 Atlanta, GA 30346 United States Tel: +1-800-250-5920

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] A doubt on count of child processes, children parameter in cfg.

Thanks for the concern. I appreciate that. It's a long story to which no one is interested. However, I understand the community is focused on the

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] A doubt on count of child processes, children parameter in cfg.

I'm pretty sure that only the SIP receiver threads create DB connections. -- Alex -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC 303 Perimeter Center North, Suite 300 Atlanta, GA 30346 United States Tel: +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (direct) Web:

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] A doubt on count of child processes, children parameter in cfg.

Hi Alex, Great. Got it :). Thanks. Process:: ID=0 PID=28493 Type=attendant Process:: ID=1 PID=28494 Type=MI FIFO Process:: ID=2 PID=28495 Type=SIP receiver udp:10.0.1.166:5060 Process:: ID=3 PID=28496 Type=time_keeper Process:: ID=4 PID=28497 Type=timer Now, I understand the count. But,

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] A doubt on count of child processes, children parameter in cfg.

:) I am facing some performance issues that's why I was thinking about those. Anyways, thanks for clearing the doubts. Thanks, Surya -- View this message in context:

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Call-id issue in Cancel message generated by tm / $T_fr_inv_timeout

Julian, No need for anything more as I managed to reproduce it. Let me dig in and fix. Regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer http://www.opensips-solutions.com On 11.02.2016 12:07, Julian Santer wrote: Hi Bogdan, thank you for your time. If you need further

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] How to send a call request to every online peer?

Hi Bogdan-Andrei. Thank you very much for the hint. By the way, I have tried it but without success. It seems that the call request is only forwarded to the last subscriber, not sent to every online subscriber. See: The code : append_branch();