Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] How to overcome SIP ALG on Wi-Fi routers

TCP works for me. On May 2, 2016 8:43 PM, "Nabeel" wrote: > Thanks for the suggestions of using TLS or changing the port. I changed > the port, but some routers are still able to mess with the SIP headers. I > would have used TLS, if not for two reasons: > > 1. ICE

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] How to overcome SIP ALG on Wi-Fi routers

Thanks for the suggestions of using TLS or changing the port. I changed the port, but some routers are still able to mess with the SIP headers. I would have used TLS, if not for two reasons: 1. ICE protocol was originally designed for UDP according to RFC5245, and it seems to work better with

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Memory fragments

On 05/02/2016 05:08 PM, Dragomir Haralambiev wrote: I have registration activity with Radius asin So, why do you expect fragmentation from time to time as the OpenSIPS memory manager allocates and frees SHM blocks? -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC 1447 Peachtree Street

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Memory fragments

I have registration activity with Radius asin 2016-05-02 23:44 GMT+03:00 Alex Balashov : > On 05/02/2016 04:22 PM, Dragomir Haralambiev wrote: > > Opensips has not routed any calls. >> > > Has it done anything else, including passive registration activity or any >

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Memory fragments

Hi Dragomir, And there is no activity at all on that opensips ? nothing at all ? no traffic ? Regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer http://www.opensips-solutions.com On 02.05.2016 23:22, Dragomir Haralambiev wrote: Hello, I have monitoring memory segments of Opensips

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Memory fragments

On 05/02/2016 04:44 PM, Alex Balashov wrote: On 05/02/2016 04:22 PM, Dragomir Haralambiev wrote: Opensips has not routed any calls. Has it done anything else, including passive registration activity or any periodic database-bound synchronisation tasks? Also, what about passively deflecting

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Memory fragments

On 05/02/2016 04:22 PM, Dragomir Haralambiev wrote: Opensips has not routed any calls. Has it done anything else, including passive registration activity or any periodic database-bound synchronisation tasks? -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC 1447 Peachtree Street NE,

[OpenSIPS-Users] Memory fragments

Hello, I have monitoring memory segments of Opensips 2.2. For the past 4 days memory fragment has increased from 940 to 1295. Opensips has not routed any calls. Is this normaly? Regards, Dragomir ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] How to overcome SIP ALG on Wi-Fi routers

Using TLS! Also configuring your systems/devices to use other port than 5060 may do the trick... On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Nabeel wrote: > Hi, > > Other than using rtpproxy/NAThelper modules, is there any way to > bypass/workaround SIP ALG enabled on many WiFi

[OpenSIPS-Users] How to overcome SIP ALG on Wi-Fi routers

Hi, Other than using rtpproxy/NAThelper modules, is there any way to bypass/workaround SIP ALG enabled on many WiFi routers? Although SIP ALG was designed to help with NAT, in most cases it does the opposite and breaks SIP. Nabeel ___ Users mailing

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Nathelper module doesn't send OPTIONS keepalive

Hi guys, my mistake was to configure the nathelper module on edge server. As it has to use the usrloc module and the usrloc module is on the core server. So I have loaded now the nathelper module on the core server: loadmodule "usrloc.so" modparam("usrloc", "user_column", "username")

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Re-Invite routed to private IP

Hi John, I investigated some traces from our old platform and I found a call with a private VIA and the Re-Invite is done correctly. You can find the trace here: http://siptrace.rolbox.net/ok.html The trace with the broken Re-Invite here: http://siptrace.rolbox.net/ko.html Kind regards, Julian

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Dynamic Routing module issue with srip

Thanks Bogdan for your prompt reply but seems that don't work as expected: i need to strip leading '0' from called R-URI and To ! Just to help, i try to describe better my context: for any external calls, i use route[pstn]: route[pstn] { # Default outbound carrier $var(carrier) =