The ack is from the cp. opensips is sending the 4xx.
I'll try the same on another provider. Thanks for the info
On 7 Oct 2016 18:27, "Newlin, Ben" wrote:
> The most likely cause is that there is something wrong in the format of
> the ACK which is causing the far end to not recognize it as being
The most likely cause is that there is something wrong in the format of the ACK
which is causing the far end to not recognize it as being the ACK for that 4XX
response. So the far end will continue to retransmit the 4XX response. On the
OpenSIPS side, these are recognized as retransmissions so t
Hi Guys,
Not sure if this a problem or normal behaviour or I'm doing something wrong.
after a 4XX is sent and the ACK recieved I can see 3 retransmissions of
the 4XX message all with corresponding ACKs. Whywould it re transmit
after an ACK
in the logs in the reply route I only see one. Is t
Hi, I'm trying to have my front end opensips server fail over to
different backend registrar servers when one registrar server is .
I thought I could make t_on_failure trigger after the timeout waiting for
the response from server 1. Unfortunately when server 1 is UP, the 401
challenge is being tr
Yes record route headers are set just as the default config file has them.
Also do note that the A party and B party are not registered users. The
setup is also behind NAT as well. Regardless of these two the calls work
completely just flawless in case the caller side is on UDP.
I do see BYE reac
Hi Agalya,
Fixes are pushed also in minor releases. So all the fixes done in trunk
will also be part of the 2.2.2 minor release.
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 03.10.2016 22:08, Ramachandran, Agalya (Contractor) wrote:
Hi te
No problem.
Thanks, but I am not using 2.2 and not using the topology_hiding module. I am
using the Dialog module with the topology_hiding function in 1.11.
Ben Newlin
From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Date: Friday, September 30, 2016 at 4:39 AM
To: "Newlin, Ben" , OpenSIPS users mailling list
Subj
Ben,
In 1.11, if you do TH, you should use match_dialog() function and not
loose_route() at all.
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 30.09.2016 16:21, Newlin, Ben wrote:
No problem.
Thanks, but I am not using 2.2 and not using t
Yes, that is what you suggested before. My comments below were stating that
that does not work. Specifically, “the match_dialog function must do loose
routing on its own” because even when I only call match_dialog() from the
script, I can still see the loose_route processing being triggered in t
Ben,
The match_dialog() does not uses or rely on the loose_route()
functionality- I briefly checked the code in 1.11; but if you have some
logs to show it otherwise, do not hesitate to share with me (of course,
if you are 100% sure you do not also call loose_route() from scritp ;) ).
Regards
10 matches
Mail list logo
