Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] nat issue

Hello Bogdan yes this was the case... thank you! br miha On 15/11/2016 18:35, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: Hi Miha, When you handle REGISTER requests (from behind NAT) most probably you use fix_nated_contact() instead of fix_nated_register(). Regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips 2.2.2 and top hiding

Hello, Razvan! http://pastebin.com/8crHznky mailto:denis7...@mail.ru Hi, Denis! Could you also send the logs for INVITE? It seems like the dialog is storing a bogus Contact header. PS: please attach the logs on pastebin.com, not directly in the email. Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Does OpenSIPS support RFC 5626 (Require Outbound)

Nevermind Missed the part about the REGISTER request having a Loose Route In message #9, Bob's UA sends its first registration through the first edge proxy in the outbound-proxy-set *by including a loose route* *Route: * If Snom can't do that then it cannot

[OpenSIPS-Users] Does OpenSIPS support RFC 5626 (Require Outbound)

I was doing some testing with Snom phones to try and get the phone to register to two Edge Proxies at once. With Snom you are able to configure multiple outbound proxies for a user. Snom sends a REGISTER to the first proxy without issue but the 200 response back from OpenSIPS doesn't have the

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Topology_Hiding adding extra VIA header

Hi Again, Is this related to the "*Work Still in progress"* related to Topology_hiding module as mentioned here at changelog: http://opensips.org/pub/opensips/2.2.2/ChangeLog 2015-10-14 Vlad Paiu * [c0f25f7] : Added Re-INVITE in-dialog pinging support Controlled via

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Topology_Hiding adding extra VIA header

Hi, Sammy! What errors is the topo hiding function logging? Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com On 11/15/2016 07:19 PM, SamyGo wrote: Hi Razvan, I just noticed that since Topo hiding function gives error, the calls using this do not show any changes

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips 2.2.2 and top hiding

Hi, Denis! Could you also send the logs for INVITE? It seems like the dialog is storing a bogus Contact header. PS: please attach the logs on pastebin.com, not directly in the email. Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com On 11/15/2016 04:34 PM, Denis

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] nat issue

Hi Miha, When you handle REGISTER requests (from behind NAT) most probably you use fix_nated_contact() instead of fix_nated_register(). Regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer http://www.opensips-solutions.com On 15.11.2016 09:11, Miha wrote: Hello i need one info. I

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Strange behavior with BYE message on Opensips 2.1

Hi Guillaume, The incoming BYE is broken - the IP of your OpenSIPS can be found both in RURI and in the top Route header. As the IP is found in RURI makes OpenSIPS think that the previous hop was a strict router. and this leads to the infinite loop. Looking at it, I see the typical mistake

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Topology_Hiding adding extra VIA header

Hi Razvan, I just noticed that since Topo hiding function gives error, the calls using this do not show any changes in CallID or Contact or any other details , seems like topohiding is not doing it's job for such calls anymore. ! Kindly let me know of anything further required to get this

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] CACHEDB_MEMCACHED Module - libmemcached undefined symbol issue

OK, thank you for the update Maciej, Best regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer http://www.opensips-solutions.com On 15.11.2016 18:28, Maciej Bylica wrote: Hi Bogdan, Thanks for reply. Right, Opensips module was not the source of the problem. I've managed to solve the

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] [OpenSIPS-users] FOSDEM Real Time Communications devroom seeks speakers / volunteers

Hi, Saul! Thanks for the heads-up, we'll definitely be there! See you in Brussels! Cheers, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com On 11/14/2016 11:39 PM, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé wrote: Hi there! It’s that time of the year again, time for FOSDEM paper submissions! Next

[OpenSIPS-Users] Strange behavior with BYE message on Opensips 2.1

Hello all, I'm working a project with multiples opensips (each handling a particular role). So when an invite goes in our plateform, it crosse multiples openips and can even sometime go though a specific opensips multiples times. My problem is: When the called send a BYE I have a strange

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] CACHEDB_MEMCACHED Module - libmemcached undefined symbol issue

Hi Bogdan, Thanks for reply. Right, Opensips module was not the source of the problem. I've managed to solve the issue, memcache is working fine. Thanks Maciej. 2016-11-10 12:56 GMT+01:00 Bogdan-Andrei Iancu : > Hi Maciej, > > As I see, you are manually compiling and

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Support for https in async

Just make sure "libcurl-gnutls-dev"is uninstalled. Should do the trick. Liviu Chircu OpenSIPS Developer http://www.opensips-solutions.com On 15.11.2016 17:34, Ramachandran, Agalya (Contractor) wrote: Hi Liviu, How can I point to opensips to use "libcurl-openssl-dev" instead of “gnutls-dev”

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Support for https in async

Hi Liviu, How can I point to opensips to use "libcurl-openssl-dev" instead of "gnutls-dev" -? Would be great if you guide me here. Regards, Agalya From: Liviu Chircu [mailto:li...@opensips.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2016 12:29 PM To: Ramachandran, Agalya (Contractor)

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips 2.2.2 and top hiding

In attachment. mailto:denis7...@mail.ru Can you put on pastebin the debug logs for the ACK? Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com On 11/15/2016 03:44 PM, Denis wrote: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips 2.2.2 and top hiding Hello Ben. I am using loadbalacer

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips 2.2.2 and top hiding

Can you put on pastebin the debug logs for the ACK? Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com On 11/15/2016 03:44 PM, Denis wrote: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips 2.2.2 and top hiding Hello Ben. I am using loadbalacer module and using only for initial INVITE.

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips 2.2.2 and top hiding

Hello Ben. I am using loadbalacer module and using only for initial INVITE. mailto:denis7...@mail.ru You said you are doing load balancing as well. Are you doing load balancing on the ACK? What module are you using (dispatcher, loadbalancer, etc.)? Load balancing functions can change the

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips 2.2.2 and top hiding

You said you are doing load balancing as well. Are you doing load balancing on the ACK? What module are you using (dispatcher, loadbalancer, etc.)? Load balancing functions can change the R-URI. Ben Newlin From: on behalf of Denis

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips 2.2.2 and top hiding

Hello, Razvan! No, i don`t make any modification for that variables " if (match_dialog() || topology_hiding_match()) { if (!$DLG_status == NULL) { xlog("L_INFO", "Route0:$rm was received (IPS=$si, IPD=$rd, CALLID=$ci, FROMTAG=$ft, TOTAG=$tt, AUTH=$au) and RURI = $ru/$rd");

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips 2.2.2 and top hiding

Hi, Denis! Are you modifying the $ru/$rd variables anyhwere in your script for that ACK? I am seeing the R-URI of the ACK going to 3.3.3.3:5068: ACK sip:3364021@3.3.3.3:5068 SIP/2.0. However, it should be: ACK sip:3364021@4.4.4.4:5060 SIP/2.0. Can you try printing the $ru variable just after

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Topology_Hiding adding extra VIA header

Hi, Samy! Can you make sure you are not calling topology_hiding() twice on the same request? Can you put an xlog just before each topology_hiding() apearence in your code to make sure? Best regards, Răzvan Crainea OpenSIPS Solutions www.opensips-solutions.com On 11/14/2016 08:30 PM, SamyGo

[OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips 2.2.2 and top hiding

Hello! I try to make top hiding using topology_hiding module. In attachment you can find a log of unsuccessful call. Scheme of the call SIP UA (2.2.2.2) -> Opensips with top hiding (1.1.1.1) -> another Opensis proxy (3.3.3.3) - > PSTN GW (4.4.4.4) -> PSTN. As i understand, the problem is