[OpenSIPS-Users] mi_fifo lock on reply after a period of time in 3.1.3

2021-10-01 Thread Andrew Yager
Hi, Not entirely sure where to start digging on this one. On 3.1.3 we've had an issue appear "suddenly" whereby our mi command output seems to "block" and not return any useful data. Restarting opensips processes restores comms. We end up with a huge number of opensips_fifo_reply_\* files in the

[OpenSIPS-Users] query cashed dr_rules table

2021-10-01 Thread Marcin Groszek
Is there a way to query cashed dr_rules table? I know it can be done by avp_db_query("SELECT count(prefix),attrs from dr_rules where but this will be resource hungry. -- Best Regards: ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://list

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] DROUTING module flag changes

2021-10-01 Thread Ben Newlin
Liviu, Thank you, I do see it there. So it is confirmed the flags have shifted. It appears the module documentation is still in need of some updates to reflect this change for carriers. Ben Newlin From: Liviu Chircu Date: Friday, October 1, 2021 at 3:35 PM To: OpenSIPS users mailling list , B

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] DROUTING module flag changes

2021-10-01 Thread Liviu Chircu
On 01.10.2021 21:34, Ben Newlin wrote: Can anyone clarify the expected behavior here? Were the values for the flags column changed as part of removing the weight flag? Hey Ben, I believe you're referring to a change from 3.1, where the carrier "W" flag was removed & all other flags were sh

[OpenSIPS-Users] DROUTING module flag changes

2021-10-01 Thread Ben Newlin
Hello, I need some clarification on the new “sort_alg” columns added to the DROUTING module tables in 3.x. The column was added to the DrRules table, and the documentation has been updated to reflect that the “W” flag passed to do_routing is now deprecated and has been replaced by the value in

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] question on call handling.

2021-10-01 Thread johan
Scenario is this A  ---> OPENSIPS and rtpengine -> B     INV ->                                 >   INV     183 sdp  <                              <183 sdp                                                   <  480   -

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] question on call handling.

2021-10-01 Thread Ben Newlin
No, this is not allowed by the specification, though some devices do handle it. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3261#section-13.2.1 Ben Newlin From: Users on behalf of johan Date: Friday, October 1, 2021 at 10:35 AM To: OpenSIPS users mailling list Subject: [OpenSIPS-Users] question

[OpenSIPS-Users] question on call handling.

2021-10-01 Thread johan
Dears, this is more a general sip question.  when establishing a dialog is it then allowed to change the sdp that you have sent in 183 to somehting else in 200 Ok ? wkr, ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-b

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] opensips-cli DB migrate Question

2021-10-01 Thread Mark Farmer
Use the -o option to set the DB host :) Perfect thanks! On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 at 14:52, Liviu Chircu wrote: > On 01.10.2021 16:01, Mark Farmer wrote: > > > > I will need to upgrade some OpenSIPS 3.0 servers to 3.2 where the > > database for the ACC module is located on a different server to the >

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] opensips-cli DB migrate Question

2021-10-01 Thread Liviu Chircu
On 01.10.2021 16:01, Mark Farmer wrote: I will need to upgrade some OpenSIPS 3.0 servers to 3.2 where the database for the ACC module is located on a different server to the rest of the OpenSIPS database. Is there a way to specify the different location when upgrading the ACC tables? Hi M

[OpenSIPS-Users] opensips-cli DB migrate Question

2021-10-01 Thread Mark Farmer
Hi everyone I will need to upgrade some OpenSIPS 3.0 servers to 3.2 where the database for the ACC module is located on a different server to the rest of the OpenSIPS database. Is there a way to specify the different location when upgrading the ACC tables? Does anyone else have to deal with this