Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Some questions regarding configuring msilo

Hi Robert, I guess you are talking about his https://opensips.org/html/docs/modules/3.2.x/msilo.html#idp5708384 ? Which looks like it was not updated since ages.it is not even 3.2 compatible actually. The "# if the downstream UA does not support MESSAGE requests" block is outside the

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Drouting /timerec documentation for 3.2 vs 3.1

Hi Ben, Fixes what I found on this matter, see [1]. Do you see any of these leftovers left in the current doc ? [1] https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/394ba080486f97f44afaf794fa82aba1f630b186 Thanks and regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Syntax in 3.2

Hi Jehanzaib, the "status" keyword was dropped for a long time [1], use $rs instead. [1] https://www.opensips.org/Documentation/Migration-2-3-0-to-2-4-0#toc4 Regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer https://www.opensips-solutions.com OpenSIPS eBootcamp 2021

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] How to get all listening socket IP address as variable

Hi, I see, you start listening on an interface (enp2s0), which translates into the DHCP IP, but you can not use the socket/listener to do a force send socket as there is no way to reference it. Unfortunately something like that is not possible right now, but I see it as a valuable

[OpenSIPS-Users] Syntax in 3.2

Hi experts, I have just upgraded my old opensips to 3.2 version. Getting quite a few syntax errors. Running out of time, so thought maybe someone can quickly help out . The error comes at if(status=~"[12][0-9][0-9]") May be someone can write us the correct syntax for status code checking? Thank

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] TLS Handshake fail issue

Hi Devang, The tls_mgm module configuration looks OK. Have you also tried to connect with openssl s_client to the TLS endpoint? Regards, -- Vlad Patrascu OpenSIPS Core Developer http://www.opensips-solutions.com On 17.11.2021 10:33, Devang Dhandhalya wrote: Hello Bogdan  I Just casually 

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] STIR/SHAKEN E.164 strict mode module parameter not working .

Hi Devang, The error: ERROR:stir_shaken:add_identity_hf: Failed to convert from DER to internal format may be a bit misleading as the private key and certificate must be provided in PEM format to the stir_shaken_auth() function. The DER format that the error refers to is used only

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] 3.2.3 TLS issue

Hi Gregory, It is difficult to draw any conclusions without a backtrace so I'm hoping you'll be able to get the proper core dumps again in order to investigate this further. Regards, -- Vlad Patrascu OpenSIPS Core Developer http://www.opensips-solutions.com On 12.11.2021 14:44, Gregory

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Offline messaging server

Thank you once again for sharing another great opensource project Adrian!!! Στις Πέμ, 18 Νοε 2021, 21:11 ο χρήστης Adrian Georgescu έγραψε: > You can now use Sylk Server as SIP messaging server, is very use to use > (zero configuration) and should interoperate easy with any SIP client or >

[OpenSIPS-Users] Offline messaging server

You can now use Sylk Server as SIP messaging server, is very use to use (zero configuration) and should interoperate easy with any SIP client or Proxy. The functionality is similar to what WhatsApp and Telegram offer with the difference that both client and server software are fully open source

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Drouting /timerec documentation for 3.2 vs 3.1

While you are in the drouting module docs, there are multiple places in there where the changes from flags to sort_alg were not documented, especially for dr_carriers routing. Ben Newlin From: Users on behalf of Liviu Chircu Date: Thursday, November 18, 2021 at 5:14 AM To: pke...@gmail.com

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Drouting /timerec documentation for 3.2 vs 3.1

On 18.11.2021 12:09, Pete Kelly wrote: It looks like there are quite a few inconsistencies on the drouting documentation page versus the docs here https://opensips.org/docs/modules/3.2.x/cfgutils.html#func_check_time_rec

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Drouting /timerec documentation for 3.2 vs 3.1

Cool, it's not just me then! It looks like there are quite a few inconsistencies on the drouting documentation page versus the docs here https://opensips.org/docs/modules/3.2.x/cfgutils.html#func_check_time_rec - so maybe just a link or reference to check_time_rec would work for consistency?

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Drouting /timerec documentation for 3.2 vs 3.1

On 18.11.2021 12:02, Pete Kelly wrote: However the format is documented the same way in both 3.1 and 3.2 within the "More on time recurrence" section 3.1: https://opensips.org/html/docs/modules/3.1.x/drouting.html 3.2:

[OpenSIPS-Users] Drouting /timerec documentation for 3.2 vs 3.1

Hi I notice that the timerec format has been updated in 3.2, specifically for the drouting module. The migration document mentions that there are a number of changes to the format. Migration document: https://www.opensips.org/Documentation/Migration-3-1-0-to-3-2-0#toc18 However the format is

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips segfault after adding acc_extra field

Thanks Aron, I will check over there. Regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer https://www.opensips-solutions.com OpenSIPS eBootcamp 2021 https://opensips.org/training/OpenSIPS_eBootcamp_2021/ On 11/17/21 9:20 PM, Podrigal, Aron wrote: Hi Bogdan-Andrei I opened a