Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Remove Route Header!

2023-06-02 Thread morris edery
i put the remove_hf() below it will remove from the header Contact and User-Agent and will rename the new User-Agent but Route won't remove and still appear on the outgoing invite message route[RELAY] { remove_hf("Route"); remove_hf("Contact"); remove_hf("User-Agent");

[OpenSIPS-Users] Dispatcher state exchange in an anycast clusterer

2023-06-02 Thread Denys Pozniak
Hello! I need advice on how best to implement the anycast + clusterer + dispatcher scheme. In short, we want to build an additional upper layer in front of our sip legacy servers, on which traffic balancing will take place. Most likely it will look like several nodes of the same clusterer with a

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Registration passthrough

2023-06-02 Thread nutxase via Users
Hi Daniel Yes i did check sure i will send you the opensips.cfg off list now(will remove my hosts) Thanks!!! Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email. --- Original Message --- On Friday, June 2nd, 2023 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Zanutti wrote: > Did you check SIP messages

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Registration passthrough

2023-06-02 Thread Daniel Zanutti
Did you check SIP messages inside your opensips box? I saw home routers changing the Contact some time ago. I could help if you send the whole script, cannot help further without seeing the whole picture. Regards On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 7:51 AM nutxase wrote: > So i now have only > if

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Registration passthrough

2023-06-02 Thread nutxase via Users
So i now have only if (is_method("REGISTER")) { forward("myasterisk.server.com[:5060](http://node3.sipalto.com:5080)"); exit; } but the contact shows as sip:zyq5d7rf@opensips-ip:5060^...so i need it to be sip:extensionnumber@deviceip:5060xxx Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Remove Route Header!

2023-06-02 Thread Răzvan Crainea
Hi, Morris! The code you are trying to run removes the Route header for the outgoing message, but the inbound/received INVITE still has the Route header, hence loose_route() sees it and denies it. Do note that loose_route() itself removes the route, if its preloaded, so if you do want to