Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] strange (?) loose_route() behaviour

2011-10-04 Thread Victor Gamov
our. From my point of view this is not a bug, because if you add a domain to OpenSIPS, it will know that it is responsible for that domain, and act accordingly. -- CU, Victor Gamov <>___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

[OpenSIPS-Users] strange (?) loose_route() behaviour

2011-10-01 Thread Victor Gamov
) then request routed properly Also, I try old kamailio-1.5.1 with this configuration and request routed as expected by me Is this bug/feature or my misunderstood of loose_route (again?! :-) ) Thanks! -- CU, Victor Gamov <>___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] CANCEL auth

2011-06-24 Thread Victor Gamov
are looking at are populated during the auth process (which is not done in your case). Regards, Bogdan On 06/24/2011 04:51 PM, Victor Gamov wrote: Hi All I have following config code: if ( is_method("INVITE|UPDATE|SUBSCRIBE|MESSAGE|CANCEL") ) { if ( ! proxy

[OpenSIPS-Users] CANCEL auth

2011-06-24 Thread Victor Gamov
auth, uri="sip:1...@domain.ru;user=phone", nonce="4e04936f000153cdf04ef598707f3849686bee7b566a", nc=0002, cnonce="85b6b55d74844e156b6858a1a881f174", response="1210aa91a7507e4af9a035dfadb969bc". Max-Forwards: 70. User-Agent: C470 IP/0222700

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Two Opensips proxies sharing the same DB

2011-01-31 Thread Victor Gamov
IP-address may be used to generate 305 "Use proxy" in "shared DB environment" -- CU, Victor Gamov <>___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] loose_route()

2010-11-15 Thread Victor Gamov
Thanks Bogdan! On 11.11.2010 14:15, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: Victor Gamov wrote: I hope that loose_route() will process Route headers not RURI. RFC-3261 16.4 says that "The proxy MUST inspect the Request-URI of the request. If the Request-URI of the request contains a value this

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] loose_route()

2010-11-10 Thread Victor Gamov
ip:X.X.X.X;lr=on;ftag=2204003977). So Route header Route: removed, R-URI untouched, next Route processed and $du is sip:X.X.X.X:50080 now. As my script does not decide to call lookup() but t_relay(), then request forwarded to $du. This was my (incorrect) logic... -- CU, Vi

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] loose_route()

2010-11-08 Thread Victor Gamov
a loose router before t_relay(): METHOD=ACK; R-URI=sip:X.X.X.X:50080;lr=on; du=sip:X.X.X.X;lr=on;ftag=2204003977; dp=5060; Where I'm wrong? On 23.10.2010 16:07, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: Victor Gamov wrote: Sorry for my mistake. Original packet is: --- ACK sip:5700...@x.x.x.x SIP/2.0

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] loose_route()

2010-10-20 Thread Victor Gamov
On 20.10.2010 20:28, Stanisław Pitucha wrote: On 20/10/10 15:08, Victor Gamov wrote: Ca somebody explain me which result expected when loose_route() called by X.X.X.X for request like following: - ACK sip:5700...@x.x.x.x SIP/2.0. Record-Route: To:;tag=4ded008d6ca9692485d1918f60c7da12

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] loose_route()

2010-10-20 Thread Victor Gamov
On 20.10.2010 18:08, Victor Gamov wrote: Hi! Ca somebody explain me which result expected when loose_route() called by X.X.X.X for request like following: - ACK sip:5700...@x.x.x.x SIP/2.0. Record-Route: To: ;tag=4ded008d6ca9692485d1918f60c7da12 - I hope that (as RFC3261 says at

[OpenSIPS-Users] loose_route()

2010-10-20 Thread Victor Gamov
removed (this route node has been reached) -- loose_route() return TRUE -- CU, Victor Gamov <>___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] avp_db_query doesn't save value

2010-09-13 Thread Victor Gamov
;$avp(i:100)"); xlog("*** Blink Call Forwarding to $avp(i:100)\n"); type mismatch? CHAR(64) at DB but integer type for $avp(i:100) try to use $avp(s:fwd) -- CU, Victor Gamov <>___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Strange username registration

2010-04-07 Thread Victor Gamov
same type of fix to register requests. Either I need to be able to reject the above messages with invalid formatted headers, or I need t rewrite things (which I'm not always comfortable doing within opensips) I appreciate the assistance. -- CU, Victor Gamov <>__

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] mailing list reply-to : list or sender

2009-08-11 Thread Victor Gamov
I read many list many years and OpenSER-based software lists (OpenSER, OpenSIPS) are only lists where I send reply to poster when I press "reply" button. If I send my questions into list than I expect to read answers at list but not as my personal email. IMHO On 05.08.2009 17:58, Brett Nemero

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Transfering "hold" event from OpenSIPS to SEMS for music on hold

2009-07-03 Thread Victor Gamov
looks like b2bua module announced in 1.6 will resolve this situation http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/2009-July/006669.html On 23.06.2009 15:57, Yehavi Bourvine wrote: > Unfortunately it seems that Stefan's answer is the correct one... Thanks > anyway! >__Yehavi: >

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] opensips - hiding interconnection information

2009-07-01 Thread Victor Gamov
On 01.07.2009 17:07, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: > Hi Iñaki, > > not exactly - for hiding the network information is enough to hide some > headers (like RR, VIA, Contact). Call-Id have IP info too. Pure B2BUA may be a really nice module. Thanks! -- CU,