Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Not enough free pkg memory

2023-11-09 Thread solarmon
What memory management and allocator are you using? I had similar issues using opensips 3.2.7 and the quick workaround was to change from F_MALLOC to HP_MALLOC. But I thought there should have been fixes for such issues in newer versions, so your issue might be different. On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 at

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Custom field in dialog list (dlg_list)

2021-12-17 Thread solarmon
Hi Giovanni, I personally use PHP to parse the JSON formatted data - but most scripting and programming languages will have a way of doing it. I would assume you could use the opensipsctrl (or opensips-cli) and MI JSON commands to get a script to control opensips - so it will be dependent on

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] dlg_list - caller_sdp and callee_sdp

2021-12-17 Thread solarmon
Hi Gionanni, Thank you for the pointer. In our opensips config, I see that we currently use: create_dialog("B") Cheers! On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 15:12, Giovanni Maruzzelli wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 8:49 AM solarmon wrote: > >> >> I'm not sure what

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Custom field in dialog list (dlg_list)

2021-12-17 Thread solarmon
https://opensips.org/training/OpenSIPS_eBootcamp_2021/ > > On 12/14/21 11:05 AM, solarmon wrote: > > Hi, > > In opensips 2.4.x is there a way to inject a custom field into the dialog > list? For example, inject a custom SIP header into it? > > Thank you! > > __

[OpenSIPS-Users] Custom field in dialog list (dlg_list)

2021-12-14 Thread solarmon
Hi, In opensips 2.4.x is there a way to inject a custom field into the dialog list? For example, inject a custom SIP header into it? Thank you! ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] dlg_list - caller_sdp and callee_sdp

2021-12-06 Thread solarmon
Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 12:05, Răzvan Crainea wrote: > Those fields are usually used for re-INVITE pinging. Are you using this > feature? > > Best regards, > > Răzvan Crainea > OpenSIPS Core Developer > http://www.opensips-solutions.com > > On 12/2/21 14:45, solarmon

[OpenSIPS-Users] dlg_list - caller_sdp and callee_sdp

2021-12-02 Thread solarmon
Hi, In opensips 2.4.x the dialog list contains the following fields for SDP: * caller_sdp * callee_sdp However, these are always empty. What are these fields used for and how can I get it populated - with, I assume, SDP information for the dialog? Cheers!

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] How to get all listening socket IP address as variable

2021-11-17 Thread solarmon
An alternative method is to use m4 to feed in the detected IP address into a templated version of the opensips config file. On Wed, 17 Nov 2021, 08:23 Muhamad Putra Abdullah, wrote: > Hi, > > > > socket=udp:enp1s0:5060 tag INTERNAL_IP # CUSTOMIZE ME > > socket=udp:enp2s0:5060 tag EXTERNAL_IP

[OpenSIPS-Users] Dispatcher and rtpproxy group IDs shown in dialog info?

2021-08-20 Thread solarmon
Hi, I'm using "opensipsctl fifo dlg_list_ctx" to get information on what active dialogs there are. I am also looking for information about what dispatcher and rtpproxy group the call dialog is using. Is it possible to get this information for the call dialog, or inject that information into the

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] dlg_sharing_tag behaviour in an active/backup setup

2021-07-14 Thread solarmon
lusterer would make set > it to "backup" on other node. > > Cheers, > Kingsley. > > > On Tue, 2021-07-13 at 14:08 +0100, solarmon wrote: > > Hi Liviu, > > > > I took and used the 'recommended' config as advised at > > > https://blog.opensips.or

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] dlg_sharing_tag behaviour in an active/backup setup

2021-07-13 Thread solarmon
you. On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 12:59, Liviu Chircu wrote: > On 25.06.2021 15:12, solarmon wrote: > > The typical recommended configuration for an active/standby setup would be: > > node1: > > modparam("dialog", "dlg_sharing_tag", "vip=active") &

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Dialog cluster syncing behaviour

2021-07-13 Thread solarmon
make sure that a version mismatch not causing the issue. Thank you. On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 12:50, Liviu Chircu wrote: > On 25.06.2021 13:26, solarmon wrote: > > Can anybody confirm whether this behaviour is by design and/or whether > > how to force the opensips to sync all the Dial

[OpenSIPS-Users] fr_timeout CANCEL message sent to timed out dispatcher endpoint IP

2021-06-29 Thread solarmon
Hi, Using opensips 2.4.x I'm testing some call failure scenarios and this particular test is to drop the IP connectivity to the dispatcher endpoints and see what happens when a new call is made and before the endpoint is considered unhealthy. The expected behaviour is that the INVITE will not

[OpenSIPS-Users] dlg_sharing_tag behaviour in an active/backup setup

2021-06-25 Thread solarmon
Hi, In a two node cluster with dialog sharing tags configure, the typical recommended configuration for an active/standby setup would be: node1: modparam("dialog", "dlg_sharing_tag", "vip=active") node2: modparam("dialog", "dlg_sharing_tag", "vip=backup") Now imagine if node2 becomes the

[OpenSIPS-Users] Dialog cluster syncing behaviour

2021-06-25 Thread solarmon
Hi, I am observing an issue with the Dialog syncing between two opensips nodes, and a corosync/pacemaker cluster setup. I'm using 'opensipsctl fifo dlg_list' - more specifically 'opensipsctl fifo dlg_list | grep caller_contact' - to check the Dialogs on both the 'active' (one with the floating

[OpenSIPS-Users] regexp extraction in to a variable

2021-05-24 Thread solarmon
Hi, If I had a $fn (From display name) core variable in the format: "ABC123456789" I know how to match on "ABC", but how can I extract "1234567879" to put into another variable? Thank you. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] t_reply() with Reason header

2021-04-16 Thread solarmon
ike sip msg) ? > > Regards, > > Bogdan-Andrei Iancu > > OpenSIPS Founder and Developer > https://www.opensips-solutions.com > OpenSIPS Bootcamp 2021 online > https://opensips.org/training/OpenSIPS_eBootcamp_2021/ > > On 4/16/21 1:28 PM, solarmon wrote: > >

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] t_reply() with Reason header

2021-04-16 Thread solarmon
nSIPS_eBootcamp_2021/ > > On 4/16/21 12:22 PM, solarmon wrote: > > Hi, > > We have a code that response back with a "503 Service not available" if it > has exhausted all the dispatcher endpoints - see end of email. > > It would be useful if we casn send back th

[OpenSIPS-Users] t_reply() with Reason header

2021-04-16 Thread solarmon
Hi, We have a code that response back with a "503 Service not available" if it has exhausted all the dispatcher endpoints - see end of email. It would be useful if we casn send back the Reason header of the last rejection. Could this be done and what should I look at? Thank you!

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] opensips 2.4.7 - Dispatcher ds_is_in_list() DNS resolution

2021-03-01 Thread solarmon
is reloaded? Can this be done without impacting active sessions/dialogs? Thanks. On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 at 16:11, Liviu Chircu wrote: > On 01.03.2021 18:04, solarmon wrote: > > I would like somebody to confirm this is the behaviour - i.e. > > ds_is_in_list() does a DNS lookup on the Dest

[OpenSIPS-Users] opensips 2.4.7 - Dispatcher ds_is_in_list() DNS resolution

2021-03-01 Thread solarmon
Hi, Can somebody confirm the following behaviour in opensips 2.4.7 I have a dispatcher endpoint with a DNS address as the Destination address. When doing a ds_is_in_list() check and passing it the $si (Source IP address) will it perform a DNS resolution before trying to match the IP? I see in

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] PRACK response to 183 without SDP

2021-01-18 Thread solarmon
, Ovidiu Sas wrote: > 100rel in the initial INVITE means that the caller has support for it, if > requested by the caller. If not present in INVITE, the caller should not > send provisional replies with 100rel. > > -ovidiu > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 15:13 solarmon wrote: >

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] PRACK response to 183 without SDP

2021-01-18 Thread solarmon
nge the 183 into an 180 and let the prack take its course. > > Alternatively, you can remove 100rel from the initial INVITE and drop the > 183 without SDP. > > -ovidiu > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 11:05 solarmon wrote: > >> Hi,, >> >> I have a requireme

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] PRACK response to 183 without SDP

2021-01-18 Thread solarmon
, wrote: > Hi, > > I guess does not answer the guestion but take a look at this: > > https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/2076 > > that said could you setup b2b logic to fix interworking issues? > > Tomi > > On 18. Jan 2021, at 18.31, solarmon wrote: &g

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] PRACK response to 183 without SDP

2021-01-18 Thread solarmon
. 2021 om 17:07 schreef solarmon : > >> Hi,, >> >> I have a requirement to stop 183 without SDP packets from being passed, >> as well as having to reply back with a PRACK. >> >> I can stop the 183 without SDP from being passed on with the following in >&g

[OpenSIPS-Users] PRACK response to 183 without SDP

2021-01-18 Thread solarmon
Hi,, I have a requirement to stop 183 without SDP packets from being passed, as well as having to reply back with a PRACK. I can stop the 183 without SDP from being passed on with the following in onreply_route[] if ($rs == "183" && !has_body_part("application/sdp")) { drop();

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Reject unsupported codec?

2021-01-07 Thread solarmon
s/modules/2.4.x/sipmsgops.html#func_codec_exists > > Regards, > > Bogdan-Andrei Iancu > > OpenSIPS Founder and Developer > https://www.opensips-solutions.com > OpenSIPS Bootcamp 2020 online > https://opensips.org/training/OpenSIPS_eBootcamp_2020/ > > On 1/7/21 6:33 P

[OpenSIPS-Users] Reject unsupported codec?

2021-01-07 Thread solarmon
Hi, On opensips 2.4.x how would I best check what codec is being offered, and reject the call if it ONLY offers a codec that is not supported by us. For example, if we only want to support G.711 PCMA/PCMU. Thank you. ___ Users mailing list

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Adding ptime to SDP

2020-12-08 Thread solarmon
carriage returns. I only needed a single '\n' at the start of the replacement text. It would have been nice for a function to append the end end of the SDP attributes, but I'm hoping this is a good enough workaround for now. Thank you once again! On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 15:25, Donat Zenichev wrote:

[OpenSIPS-Users] Adding ptime to SDP

2020-12-08 Thread solarmon
Hi, How can I add/append a ptime value in the SDP packet? I've tried using: add_body_part("a=ptime:20", "application/sdp"); However, this just creates an additional "application/sdp" section rather than add/append to the existing one. Is there not a sipmsgops or textops function to process

[OpenSIPS-Users] Injecting 'user=phone' in to SIP URI

2020-11-30 Thread solarmon
Hi, As per NICC N1035 document section 6.2 the SIP URI must end with 'user=phone'. How can this be added to a SIP URI that doesn't contain it? Is using the add_uri_param() function ( https://opensips.org/html/docs/modules/2.4.x/uri.html#func_add_uri_param) the best way to do this - i.e.?

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] siptrace - dual HEP destinations

2020-07-20 Thread solarmon
OP was that I was using TCP for the first hep_id Homer server - even though the OP showed I had it for both, my actual config only had TCP for the first entry. A previous mailing list email (and subsequent github ticket) from me about getting Homer 7 to work resulted in showing that it was only worked wit

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] siptrace - dual HEP destinations

2020-07-20 Thread solarmon
e uri's and the HEP traffic will only ever go to the second/last uri defined. So I know that HEP traffic can get each to the destinations - in terms of routing and access control. Why is siptrace not sending to both HEP destinations at the same time? On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 at 16:49, solarmon wrote: &

[OpenSIPS-Users] siptrace - dual HEP destinations

2020-07-17 Thread solarmon
Hi, I was able to get siptrace sent to a single HEP server. Now I would like to be able to send to a secondary server as an additional destination. I thought I could just create additional hep_id and trace_id entries and run sip_trace() twice, but this didn't work and only the second HEP server

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Dispatcher. Disable ping for particular entry/GW.

2020-06-29 Thread solarmon
Hi Igor, Have you tried using the ds_set_state MI command? (for 2.4.x) https://opensips.org/html/docs/modules/2.4.x/dispatcher.html#mi_ds_set_state On Sun, 28 Jun 2020 at 11:35, Igor Pavlov wrote: > Hi all, > > Is it possible to disable ping for particular entry in set at all? > > I have a

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] rtpproxy 'Memory State' 'status'

2020-06-24 Thread solarmon
fferently not with the > > $ opensipsctl fifo rtpproxy_show > > command > > I think you can get the ’status’ directly from the database with SQL > query. > > Tomi > > > On 24. Jun 2020, at 16.33, solarmon wrote: > >  > Hi Bogdan-Andrei, > > There

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] rtpproxy 'Memory State' 'status'

2020-06-24 Thread solarmon
SQL table and the `memory > status` is the status provided by the MU rtpproxy_show. > > Regards, > > Bogdan-Andrei Iancu > > OpenSIPS Founder and Developer > https://www.opensips-solutions.com > > On 6/24/20 12:16 PM, solarmon wrote: > > Hi, > > The comma

[OpenSIPS-Users] rtpproxy 'Memory State' 'status'

2020-06-24 Thread solarmon
Hi, The command "opensipsctl fifo rtpproxy_show" does not return the 'status' of the rtpproxy node. In OpenSIPS Control Panel, the RTPProxy table has a '*Memory State*' column which seems to be the 'status' of that node. How can I get this 'Memory State' 'status' in command line form so that it

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] 502 Bad Gateway events leads to calls being rejected with 480 Temporarily Unavailable

2020-06-23 Thread solarmon
gt; *Subject: *Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] 502 Bad Gateway events leads to calls > being rejected with 480 Temporarily Unavailable > > > > Hello Solarmon, > > > > I think, The * ds_mark_dst("p");* put your destinations on Probing and > after a few seconds you will get the re

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] HEPv3 siptrace to Homer v7 - "Trailing stray characters"

2020-06-22 Thread solarmon
, wrote: > Hi, > > What is the exact OpenSIPS version you have (opensips -V) ? > > Regards, > > Bogdan-Andrei Iancu > > OpenSIPS Founder and Developer > https://www.opensips-solutions.com > > On 6/18/20 12:13 PM, solarmon wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm

[OpenSIPS-Users] HEPv3 siptrace to Homer v7 - "Trailing stray characters"

2020-06-18 Thread solarmon
Hi, I'm trying to set up siptrace to send HEPv3 packets to a Homer 7 setup. Currently this is not working and it seems the HEPv3 packets coming from opensips is not being ingested for some reason. Using hepgen ( https://github.com/sipcapture/hepgen.js) to generate test HEPv3 traffic on the same

[OpenSIPS-Users] Homer docker integration - "api/preferences.php" file

2020-06-16 Thread solarmon
Hi, I'm trying to set up and integrate Homer with my opensips setup. I have managed to install Homer on separate VM, using the docker method as described at: https://github.com/sipcapture/homer/wiki/Quick-Install#-quick-install (I had to set SELINUX to permissive or disable for it to build -

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] 502 Bad Gateway events leads to calls being rejected with 480 Temporarily Unavailable

2020-06-10 Thread solarmon
be achieved in opensips when we respond back to our platform? Thank you. On Mon, 8 Jun 2020 at 13:46, Ben Newlin wrote: > Solarmon, > > > > Yes, that code is your issue. While it makes sense to mark the remote > destination unreachable on some error responses possibly, or c

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] 502 Bad Gateway events leads to calls being rejected with 480 Temporarily Unavailable

2020-06-08 Thread solarmon
} # if call failure, allow the reply to propagate to caller exit; } Thank you for the tip about the 'modparam("dispatcher", "options_reply_codes", "502")' option. I will try that if it is not recommend to change the above code. Thank

[OpenSIPS-Users] 502 Bad Gateway events leads to calls being rejected with 480 Temporarily Unavailable

2020-06-08 Thread solarmon
Hi, I'm trying to understand whether this is the correct or expected behaviour. We have two destinations configured in Dispatcher. What I am noticing is that when we receive 502 Bad Gateway messages (logged as ("call failed to established with 502 code") from both endpoints. After both

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] telephone-event rtpmap value

2020-03-31 Thread solarmon
> Best regards, > > Răzvan Crainea > OpenSIPS Core Developer > http://www.opensips-solutions.com > > On 3/27/20 4:43 PM, solarmon wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have an opensips 2.4 cluster using rtpproxy nodes. > > > > I'm troubleshooting some DTMF

[OpenSIPS-Users] telephone-event rtpmap value

2020-03-27 Thread solarmon
Hi, I have an opensips 2.4 cluster using rtpproxy nodes. I'm troubleshooting some DTMF issue and have a requirement to change the inbound INVITE SDP payload from: a=rtpmap:96 telephone-event/8000 to a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 in the outbound INVITE SDP. How could this

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] "opensipsctl fifo get_statistics 5xx_replies" - counter not incrementing

2020-03-20 Thread solarmon
g the TM module and creating > transactions for all of the 5xx responses, as far as I know. > > > > Ben Newlin > > > > *From: *Users on behalf of solarmon < > solar...@one-n.co.uk> > *Reply-To: *OpenSIPS users mailling list > *Date: *Friday, March 20, 2020 at

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] "opensipsctl fifo get_statistics 5xx_replies" - counter not incrementing

2020-03-20 Thread solarmon
ssages. XXX_transactions count transaction handled by the TM module. > > > > So if replies are incrementing but not transactions, it means you are not > creating transactions for these messages. > > > > Ben Newlin > > > > *From: *Users on behalf of solarmon <

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] "opensipsctl fifo get_statistics 5xx_replies" - counter not incrementing

2020-03-20 Thread solarmon
sterdam, May 2020 > https://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2020Amsterdam/ > > On 3/20/20 1:15 PM, solarmon wrote: > > Hi, > > I meant that the 5xx_transactions counter value does not increment. > > However, I have now found the stats counter "5xx_transactions".

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] "opensipsctl fifo get_statistics 5xx_replies" - counter not incrementing

2020-03-20 Thread solarmon
h replies. > > Regards, > > Bogdan-Andrei Iancu > > OpenSIPS Founder and Developer > https://www.opensips-solutions.com > OpenSIPS Summit, Amsterdam, May 2020 > https://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2020Amsterdam/ > > On 3/19/20 2:56 PM, solarmon

[OpenSIPS-Users] "opensipsctl fifo get_statistics 5xx_replies" - counter not incrementing

2020-03-19 Thread solarmon
Hi, I'm trying to graph the 4xx and 5xx stats on my opensips cluster. I'm making use of the "opensipsctl fifo get_statistics" command to extract the 4xx and 5xx replies counters. The 4xx counter (opensipsctl fifo get_statistics 4xx_replies) seems to incrementing as expected. However, the 5xx

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] opensips - graceful maintenance mode?

2020-01-21 Thread solarmon
: > On 21.01.2020 15:01, solarmon wrote: > > Can the drain_mode code just be put at the very start of the route {} > > block? > > If you don't mind letting SIP scanners know when you're doing > maintenance, sure. > > -- > Liviu Chircu > www.twitter.com/livi

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] opensips - graceful maintenance mode?

2020-01-21 Thread solarmon
Very good point! I'll try to figure out a more suitable place for it. Thanks so much for your help! On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 at 13:06, Liviu Chircu wrote: > On 21.01.2020 15:01, solarmon wrote: > > Can the drain_mode code just be put at the very start of the route {} > > block? &

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] opensips - graceful maintenance mode?

2020-01-21 Thread solarmon
Hi Liviu, Can the drain_mode code just be put at the very start of the route {} block? Thank you On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 at 12:29, Liviu Chircu wrote: > On 21.01.2020 14:21, solarmon wrote: > > However, now I have checked our opensips.cfg script (that was created > > for us) it lo

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] opensips - graceful maintenance mode?

2020-01-21 Thread solarmon
; } } On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 at 11:58, Liviu Chircu wrote: > On 21.01.2020 13:47, solarmon wrote: > > > > So to be clear, I cannot use the dispatcher endpoint method to stop > > responding to SIP Options pings? If I can do that, then that is the > > equivalent -

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] opensips - graceful maintenance mode?

2020-01-21 Thread solarmon
as unhealthy and not send calls to it. Thank you. On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 at 11:43, Liviu Chircu wrote: > On 21.01.2020 13:06, solarmon wrote: > > Thanks for the tip about the $shv global variables. The link you gave is > for 3.1.x, I found the equivalent for 2.4.x which is the version I'm

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] opensips - graceful maintenance mode?

2020-01-21 Thread solarmon
' mode? When I try the 'opensipsctl fifo shv_get debug' on my opensips server I get the following error: 500 command 'shv_get' not available I assume I need to have the 'cfgutils' module enabled and loaded for it to work? Thank you. On Mon, 20 Jan 2020 at 15:03, Liviu Chircu wrote: > Hi solar

[OpenSIPS-Users] opensips - graceful maintenance mode?

2020-01-20 Thread solarmon
Hi, I have an opensips two node cluster, and using the dispatcher module for 'internal' and 'external' endpoints. What is the recommended graceful method to put this opensips cluster in maintenance so that current calls are not affected. The overall effect I am looking for is for the opensips

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] INFO:db_mysql:switch_state_to_disconnected

2020-01-07 Thread solarmon
2020 at 11:55, Liviu Chircu wrote: > Hi solarmon, > > Please find an elaborate discussion on this topic here [1]. In short, > MySQL's "wait_timeout" setting directly affects the number of such errors > you are seeing in the logs, unless you are dealing with some other kin

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] INFO:db_mysql:switch_state_to_disconnected

2020-01-07 Thread solarmon
be no networking or routing or firewall that could be causing connectivity issues. Why is opensips generating such logs suggesting that it cannot connect to its local database? What could be causing this issue - opensips or the (MariaDB) database? Thank you. On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 at 14:49, solarmon

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] INFO:db_mysql:switch_state_to_disconnected

2019-12-23 Thread solarmon
point in probing mode comes from the SIP > signaling level - you should add more debugging in your script to > understand this problem, or take a look at the signaling level. > > Best regards, > > Răzvan Crainea > OpenSIPS Core Developer > http://www.opensips-solutions.com >

[OpenSIPS-Users] INFO:db_mysql:switch_state_to_disconnected

2019-12-23 Thread solarmon
Hi, I'm investigating why there was a blip in the Dispatcher endpoint SIP Options pings. The endpoint went in to "State=2 (Probing)" state and at the same time the following was logged in opensips.log: /usr/local/sbin/opensips[29087]: INFO:db_mysql:switch_state_to_disconnected: disconnect event

[OpenSIPS-Users] opensipsctl dispatcher - show and dump

2019-12-18 Thread solarmon
Hi, A question about the opensipsctl dispatcher show and dump commands. They seem to show different 'state' for each endpoint. For example: When using "opensipsctl dispatcher show":

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] opensipsctl fifo commands hanging after an opensips service restart

2019-12-17 Thread solarmon
opensipsctl fifo commands without it hanging. Note, I also had to restart the NCPA listener service for Nagios monitoring to work properly again. I still would like to understand how it got into this situation in the first place. On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 at 10:09, solarmon wrote: > Hi, > &g

[OpenSIPS-Users] opensipsctl fifo commands hanging after an opensips service restart

2019-12-17 Thread solarmon
Hi, I have an issue with opensipsctl command hanging when using fifo commands. This occurred after I issued a 'systemctl reload opensips' command. Actually, I subsequently had to issue a 'systemctl restart opensips' command since the opensips service had stopped working. Since then, when using

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] OpenSIPS 2.4 SIPREC no RTP

2019-12-05 Thread solarmon
>From my experience with testing SIPREC on OpenSIPs, I believe the Oreka solution is not SIPREC compliant - it supports passive and active recording but does not support the SIPREC protocol. So maybe, if I'm correct, then this is part of the issue you are having? I ended up using Drachtio SIPREC

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] opensipsctl fifo get_statistics - dialogs stats synced?

2019-10-21 Thread solarmon
erm "processed" should be read more generically in this context to > include to act of receiving the replicated dialog and preparing it to > become active at any time. > > Vlad Patrascu > OpenSIPS Developerhttp://www.opensips-solutions.com > > On 10/21/2019 02:5

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] opensipsctl fifo get_statistics - dialogs stats synced?

2019-10-21 Thread solarmon
Hi Vlad, That was my understanding too, but why would processed_dialogs be incrementing on the standby (State=0) node? On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 12:51, Vlad Patrascu wrote: > Hi solarmon, > > 'failed_dialogs' and 'processed_dialogs' represent the total number of > failed/proce

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] opensipsctl fifo get_statistics - dialogs stats synced?

2019-10-21 Thread solarmon
corosync/pacemaker for the virtual IP, and using 'clusterer' between the two OpenSIPS nodes). On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 11:24, Alexey Kazantsev via Users < users@lists.opensips.org> wrote: > Hi, solarmon > > no, there’s no need to sync dialogs. It’s another type of cluster. > >

[OpenSIPS-Users] opensipsctl fifo get_statistics - dialogs stats synced?

2019-10-21 Thread solarmon
Hi, Are dialogs stats meant to be totally synced between to openSIPS nodes in a cluster - i.e. when using clusterer? I am monitoring/graphing the active_dialogs, failed_dialogs and processed_dialogs for each node, using 'opensipsctl fifo get_statistics' and they are not fully synced: *Node 1:*

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] change_reply_status - dropping SDP from 183?

2019-10-18 Thread solarmon
Hi, If found the solution to my question. I used remove_body_part(): remove_body_part("application/sdp"); Thanks you. On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 09:08, solarmon wrote: > Hi, > > I am able to map 183 to 180 using the change_reply_status() function. > > However, I wo

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Convert 183 to 180?

2019-10-10 Thread solarmon
gt; >> >> *From: *Users on behalf of David >> Villasmil >> *Reply-To: *OpenSIPS users mailling list >> *Date: *Wednesday, October 9, 2019 at 5:42 AM >> *To: *OpenSIPS users mailling list >> *Subject: *Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Convert 183 to 180? >&

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Convert 183 to 180?

2019-10-09 Thread solarmon
our system. Will this change_reply_status() function allow us to do that? On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 14:23, solarmon wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks. I forgot to say that I'm using openSIPS 2.4.x, but the same > function is available for it too: > > > https://opensips.org/html/docs/modules/2.4.x/sipmsgops.html#c

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Convert 183 to 180?

2019-10-07 Thread solarmon
//opensips.org/html/docs/modules/3.0.x/sipmsgops.html#change_reply_status > > > > Ben Newlin > > > > *From: *Users on behalf of solarmon < > solar...@one-n.co.uk> > *Reply-To: *OpenSIPS users mailling list > *Date: *Monday, October 7, 2019 at 5:15 AM >

[OpenSIPS-Users] Convert 183 to 180?

2019-10-07 Thread solarmon
Hi, Our system connected to openSIPS is not handling 183 (with and without SDP) very well and is non-trivial for us to try to change the behavior. If we receive an initial 183 without SDP, it does not processed a subsequent 183 with SDP. We would like to explore how 183 (with and without SDP)

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] rtpproxy status health checking

2019-08-20 Thread solarmon
. On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 at 09:16, solarmon wrote: > Hi Razvan, > > I'm using opensips 2.4.6 (x86_64/linux) so I don't think opensips-cli is > available? > > I'm using opensipsctl to show the rtpproxy status. > > This is the output of the command after I have turned off

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] rtpproxy status health checking

2019-08-20 Thread solarmon
926858. On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 15:25, Răzvan Crainea wrote: > Hi, Solarmon! > > The parameter you should use is exactly the one you are using, > rtpproxy_disable_tout[1]. That parameter says that after OpenSIPS > detects the node as being down, it re-tries to send them requ

[OpenSIPS-Users] rtpproxy status health checking

2019-08-13 Thread solarmon
Hi, Can somebody clarify when the rtpproxy status and health checks are done and what configuration is required. I am finding that the status/health of an rtprpoxy node is only done/checked during opensips startup or rtpproxy module config reload. If the rtprpoxy node goes down or comes back up,