Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] - Clustering

And using following: Node#1 # opensips -V version: opensips 3.3.2 (x86_64/linux) flags: STATS: On, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, HP_MALLOC, DBG_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE

[OpenSIPS-Users] - Clustering

Hello All, I got two nodes in cluster formation and they are in sync. Running CLI opensips-cli -x mi ul_dump | grep "AOR\":\|Contact\":" on both nodes I can see ALL the registered endpoints . For testing purposes I have two endpoints registered on each node so a total four endpoints are visible.

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Clustering Presence opensips 3.2/3.3 in K8s environment

request I can send a SIP OPTIONS message out, so I assume I am missing a parameter or its mis configuration? Or could it be environment, this is a k8s setup. Any advice/tips would be great. Thank you . Jon Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows *Fr

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Clustering Presence opensips 3.2/3.3 in K8s environment

its mis configuration? Or could it be environment, this is a k8s setup. Any advice/tips would be great. Thank you . Jon Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows From: Jonathan Hunter<mailto:hunter...@hotmail.com> Sent: 25 April 2022 15:28 To: Bogda

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Clustering Presence opensips 3.2/3.3 in K8s environment

"SIPPING_RTO") modparam("nathelper", "sipping_from", "sip:pinger@DOMAIN") modparam("nathelper", "max_pings_lost", 2) modparam("nathelper", "cluster_id", 9) modparam("nathelper", "cluster_sharing_tag", &qu

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Clustering Presence opensips 3.2/3.3 in K8s environment

Hi Jonathan, Maybe the k8s layer (the ingress ??) sticks its tails in there - could you check at opensips level if the TCP conn is still seen as up ? Use the mi list_tcp_conns MI function https://www.opensips.org/Documentation/Interface-CoreMI-3-2#toc4 Best regard, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

[OpenSIPS-Users] Clustering Presence opensips 3.2/3.3 in K8s environment

Hi All, Has anyone managed to get presence working when using an active/active opensips setup with k8s ? Everything works apart from presence, In particular when a websocket user disconnects due to a client crash. I ideally would want to use event_route[E_CORE_TCP_DISCONNECT] to then grab the

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Clustering 2.4 and 3.0

Hi Răzvan, thank you.   So, 2.4 will be the best choice as it it LTS.   >Hi, Alexey! > >Most likely clustering 2.4 and 3.0 versions would not work, due to >different replication packets versions. > >Best regards, >Răzvan   --- BR, Alexey

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Clustering 2.4 and 3.0

Hi, Alexey! Most likely clustering 2.4 and 3.0 versions would not work, due to different replication packets versions. Best regards, Răzvan On 10/16/19 7:40 AM, Alexey Kazantsev via Users wrote: Hi list, is it a good/bad idea to create a cluster of 2.4 and 3.0 versions? Or it’s of vital

[OpenSIPS-Users] Clustering 2.4 and 3.0

Hi list,   is it a good/bad idea to create a cluster of 2.4 and 3.0 versions? Or it’s of vital importance to have the same version of instances in the cluster?   The idea is to create a federated user location cluster. [1]   [1]