Thank you Bogdan...
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
> **
> Hi Ali,
>
> Added on the list http://www.opensips.org/Main/Ver190#toc9 with a quite
> high priority ;).
>
> Regards,
>
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> OpenSIPS Founder and Developerhttp://www.opensips-solutions.com
>
Hi Ali,
Added on the list http://www.opensips.org/Main/Ver190#toc9 with a quite
high priority ;).
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 11/08/2012 07:06 PM, Ali Pey wrote:
I second this as well. Named flags would make debugging and
I second this as well. Named flags would make debugging and scripting quite
simpler.
Regards,
Ali
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> You can already use names for the route, not only numerical IDs (without
> the need of defining).
>
> For flags, you c
Hi Michael,
You can already use names for the route, not only numerical IDs (without
the need of defining).
For flags, you can use only numbers, indeed - usually I use M4 as text
preprocessor to do different complex ops over the script (like defines,
ifdefs, etc).
But maybe a built in suppor
Hi all.
I'm relatively new to OpenSIPS and still am at the very beginning of
learning how to tame this wonderful beast ;-).
One thing that I, personally, find pretty uncomfortable is that in various
places in the opensips.cfg one needs to use plain numbers to define or
modify the behaviour. That
