Hi Rodrigo,
That OPTIONS (even if it is really weird to have that OPTIONS inserted
between 200OK and ACK) should not affect the cseq numbering in ACK as it
is in opposite direction.
If you manage to get rid of that OPTION, is the ACK cseq correct ?
With this bogus scenario, can you run in lo
Dear OpenSIPS users,
I'm facing a problem related to CSeq numbers in SIP messages and maybe it is
being caused by SIP OPTIONS messages.
When a caller sends a SIP ACK to the callee, the SIP ACK has CSeq = 2. However,
after being relayed by OpenSIPS, the CSeq number become 3.
It seems that OpenSI