);
> append_branch();
> t_on_failure("6");
> xlog("L_INFO", "\n[SER]: [%Tf] [%ci] RB#6: Preparing to relay call to
> next huntlist member To <%tu> R-uri: <%ru>: \n");
> t_relay();
> } else {
> xlog("L_
");
lookup("location");
append_branch();
t_on_failure("6");
xlog("L_INFO", "\n[SER]: [%Tf] [%ci] RB#6: Preparing to relay call to next
huntlist member To <%tu> R-uri: <%ru>: \n");
t_relay();
} else {
xlog(&qu
Hi Mauro,
yes, you can can obtain a sequential forking, but what Chris is a
parallel forking but with delayed branches.
Regards,
Bogdan
Mauro Davi' wrote:
> Sorry,
>
> and if I can change the qvalue with the lookup function (how with the path
> proposed) I cannot obtain a working sequential f
Sorry,
and if I can change the qvalue with the lookup function (how with the path
proposed) I cannot obtain a working sequential forking (i.e. the first call is
sent to the first contact after the ring timeout the call (with the next_branch
function) is forwarded to the second contact and so on
