>> still to this day don¹t understand why calling t_check_trans() twice
>>> was necessary, but I can say that if I eliminate one of them, the
>>> system breaks down.
>>>
>>> Any advice? Like any good IT/Developer type, I¹d like to totally
>>> understa
t;> system breaks down.
>>
>> Any advice? Like any good IT/Developer type, I¹d like to totally
>> understand what my script is doing J
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Jeff Kronlage
>>
>> Data102//
>>
>> *From:* users-boun...@lists.opensips.org
>&
> (719) 387- x 1335 direct
> >
> > (719) 578-8844 fax
> >
>
> > j...@data102.com <mailto:j...@data102.com> <mailto:j...@data102.com
> <mailto:j...@data102.com>> / http://www.data102.com
>
> >
> > *From:* users-boun...@lists.ope
data102.com>> /
> http://www.data102.com
> >
> > *From:* users-boun...@lists.opensips.org
> <mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org>
> > <mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org
> <mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org>>
>
good IT/Developer type, I'd like to totally
understand what my script is doing J
Cheers,
Jeff Kronlage
Data102
From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Brett Nemeroff
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 7:15 AM
To: OpenSIPS users mailling l
>
> > (719) 578-8844 fax
> >
> > j...@data102.com <mailto:j...@data102.com> / http://www.data102.com
> >
> > *From:* users-boun...@lists.opensips.org
> > <mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org>
> > [mail
/www.data102.com
>
> *From:* users-boun...@lists.opensips.org
> <mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org>
> [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org
> <mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org>] *On Behalf Of *Brett
> Nemeroff
> *Sent:* Monday, October 05, 2
users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Brett Nemeroff
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 11:56 AM
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Re-invite problem -> 491 Request Pending
Jeff,
Thanks for your reply. Is this in the loose route? or.. ? Does it break
anything
users mailling list
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Re-invite problem -> 491 Request Pending
Jeff,
Thanks for your reply. Is this in the loose route? or.. ? Does it break
anything else? Bogdan, anyway you can explain what's going on here? :)
-Brett
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 12:30 PM,
www.data102.com
>
>
>
> *From:* users-boun...@lists.opensips.org [mailto:
> users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] *On Behalf Of *Brett Nemeroff
> *Sent:* Monday, October 05, 2009 9:51 AM
> *To:* users@lists.opensips.org
> *Subject:* [OpenSIPS-Users] Re-invite problem -> 491 Re
f Of Brett Nemeroff
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 9:51 AM
To: users@lists.opensips.org
Subject: [OpenSIPS-Users] Re-invite problem -> 491 Request Pending
Hello All,
I'm not sure where the problem is.. it's either my switch, or it's the
customer's box.
What's ha
Hello All,I'm not sure where the problem is.. it's either my switch, or it's
the customer's box.
What's happening is the customer sends a call. As soon as the 200OK gets
back to them, they re-invite.. very fast. The reinvite occurs BEFORE the ACK
for the 200OK makes it back to the provider. Becaus
12 matches
Mail list logo
