Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Running OpenSIPS on same box as Asterisk/FreeSwitch

2020-05-19 Thread Ben Newlin
-Original Message- From: Ben Newlin Sent: 19 May 2020 14:37 To: john.qu...@smartvox.co.uk; OpenSIPS users mailling list ; 'James Hogbin' Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Running OpenSIPS on same box as Asterisk/FreeSwitch John, This is occurring because the loca

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Running OpenSIPS on same box as Asterisk/FreeSwitch

2020-05-19 Thread John Quick
escribed in 'Core Functions' (In v2.4, they are items 45 and 46) The fourth is documented in the RR module notes John Quick Smartvox Limited > From: James Hogbin > Sent: 18 May 2020 17:24 > To: john quick ; OpenSIPS users mailling list > Subject

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Running OpenSIPS on same box as Asterisk/FreeSwitch

2020-05-19 Thread Ben Newlin
rom: James Hogbin > Sent: 18 May 2020 17:24 > To: john quick ; OpenSIPS users mailling list > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Running OpenSIPS on same box as Asterisk/FreeSwitch > > I thought I had just done some bad config. I have almost exactly

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Running OpenSIPS on same box as Asterisk/FreeSwitch

2020-05-19 Thread John Quick
third one is described in 'Core Functions' (In v2.4, they are items 45 and 46) The fourth is documented in the RR module notes John Quick Smartvox Limited > From: James Hogbin > Sent: 18 May 2020 17:24 > To: john quick ; OpenSIPS users mailling list > > Subject: Re

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Running OpenSIPS on same box as Asterisk/FreeSwitch

2020-05-18 Thread James Hogbin
I thought I had just done some bad config. I have almost exactly the same thing. I have Freeswitch And Opensips on Azure VM’s Freeswitch = 10.0.0.4 + External IP Opensips = 10.0.0.5 + External IP Both are configured to use the external addresses Freeswitch will start the conversation on its e

[OpenSIPS-Users] Running OpenSIPS on same box as Asterisk/FreeSwitch

2020-05-18 Thread John Quick
Whenever I have tried to run OpenSIPS on the same host server as either Asterisk or FreeSwitch (using different ports), I have always hit a snag with routing of sequential loose-routed requests. Possibly this only happens when using double Record-Route headers which I need for protocol conversion (