Hi, Sammy!
Most likely that WIP refers to the re-invites generated for pinging
purposes. Are you using the "R/r" flags for the create_dialog() function?
Best regards,
Răzvan Crainea
OpenSIPS Core Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 11/15/2016 09:56 PM, SamyGo wrote:
Hi Again,
Is
Hi Again,
Is this related to the "*Work Still in progress"* related to
Topology_hiding module as mentioned here at changelog:
http://opensips.org/pub/opensips/2.2.2/ChangeLog
2015-10-14 Vlad Paiu
* [c0f25f7] :
Added Re-INVITE in-dialog pinging support
Controlled via t
Hi, Sammy!
What errors is the topo hiding function logging?
Best regards,
Răzvan Crainea
OpenSIPS Solutions
www.opensips-solutions.com
On 11/15/2016 07:19 PM, SamyGo wrote:
Hi Razvan,
I just noticed that since Topo hiding function gives error, the calls
using this do not show any changes in
Hi Razvan,
I just noticed that since Topo hiding function gives error, the calls using
this do not show any changes in CallID or Contact or any other details ,
seems like topohiding is not doing it's job for such calls anymore. !
Kindly let me know of anything further required to get this resolve
Hi, Samy!
Can you make sure you are not calling topology_hiding() twice on the
same request? Can you put an xlog just before each topology_hiding()
apearence in your code to make sure?
Best regards,
Răzvan Crainea
OpenSIPS Solutions
www.opensips-solutions.com
On 11/14/2016 08:30 PM, SamyGo
Hi Razvan,
Here is the requested data.
*INITIAL INVITE: *Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 123.123.212.123:5061
;branch=z9hG4bK442.8373b213.0;i=35f5
*200 OK from the B party as received by OpenSIPS:*
Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 118.151.101.64:5061;branch=z9hG4bK442.9a584727.0;i=11
*200 OK as sent out by OpenSIPS:*
V
Hi, Samy!
Can you post on pastebin debugging logs related to this call? Also, can
you also post the Via headers of the initial INVITE and for the 200 OK
received by OpenSIPS?
Best regards,
Răzvan Crainea
OpenSIPS Solutions
www.opensips-solutions.com
On 11/12/2016 12:33 AM, SamyGo wrote:
Hi
Hi,
I'm using OpenSIPS 2.2.1 version and I'm facing a weird situation where
OpenSIPS is adding a duplicated VIA header to the 200 OK, This only happens
when I've topology_hiding() engaged into the call.
The scenario is very simple; two users making call to each other on the
same OpenSIPS but with
