Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] serialize_branches/next_branches problem

Hi Jeff, as I suspected, there was something more hiding thereA fix is available on SVN - I guess you already know the procedure - update, test and if still doesn't work, post the logs. Thanks and regards, Bogdan Jeff Pyle wrote: Hi Bogdan, It appears my therapy was not complete. I

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] serialize_branches/next_branches problem

Hi Bogdan, Works perfectly now. Thanks. - Jeff On 4/6/09 9:41 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu bog...@voice-system.ro wrote: Hi Jeff, as I suspected, there was something more hiding thereA fix is available on SVN - I guess you already know the procedure - update, test and if still doesn't

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] serialize_branches/next_branches problem

Hi Jeff, Jeff Pyle wrote: Evidently responding publically to my own question is some sort of cheap therapy. any therapy that has results is a good one :) Anyway, I found some old examples of how this is supposed to work, and all the examples included a t_on_branch() statement. My config

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] serialize_branches/next_branches problem

Hi Bogdan, It appears my therapy was not complete. I reinstalled a current build from the devel repository since 1.4.5 was crashing/stopping in weirder ways than 1.5.0. I'm back to having the two Contacts from the 302 being sent in parallel. Here are the debugs, the same as before I believe:

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] serialize_branches/next_branches problem

Hi Jeff, could you post the debug again? maybe there is something else Thanks and regards, Bogdan Jeff Pyle wrote: Hi Bogdan, I still get the parallel forking to both contacts. - Jeff On 3/26/09 2:48 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu bog...@voice-system.ro wrote: Hi Jeff, I found a

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] serialize_branches/next_branches problem

Hi Bogdan, Here it is: Mar 30 14:55:58 opensips[16337]: DBG:uac_redirect:get_redirect: resume branch=0 Mar 30 14:55:58 opensips[16337]: DBG:uac_redirect:get_redirect: checking branch=0 (added=0) Mar 30 14:55:58 opensips[16337]: DBG:uac_redirect:get_redirect: branch=0 is a redirect (added=0)

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] serialize_branches/next_branches problem

Evidently responding publically to my own question is some sort of cheap therapy. Anyway, I found some old examples of how this is supposed to work, and all the examples included a t_on_branch() statement. My config did not. I ripped off one of the examples almost character for character and it

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] serialize_branches/next_branches problem

Hi Bogdan, Debug level was 6 for get_redirects(*), serialize_branches(1) and next_branches(). The contact header from the 302 was as follows: Contact:sip:+1303...@ww.xx.116.46:5060;user=phone;q=0.5,sip:+1303 0...@ww.xx.119.46:5060;user=phone;q=0.25 Debug output:

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] serialize_branches/next_branches problem

Hi Jeff, please post the debug=6 logs - also be sure you are using the latest version as a similar bug was fixed one or two weeks ago. Regards, Bogdan Jeff Pyle wrote: Hello, I catch a 302 in a failure_route that runs: get_redirects(“*”), serialize_branches and next_branches. The

[OpenSIPS-Users] serialize_branches/next_branches problem

Hello, I catch a 302 in a failure_route that runs: get_redirects(³*²), serialize_branches and next_branches. The subsequent t_relay() causes a parallel fork to both contacts in the 302¹s Contact header. The 302¹s Contact header looks like this: