[Pw_forum] Compiling problem about PGI

2006-02-16 Thread Hai-Ping Lan
Dear Colleagues: I tried to compile espresso-3.0 with PGI compilor 5.1 under RedHatWS-4.0 ,and the CPUs are AMD operon 248. When i ran the shell command ./configure within ~/espresso-3.0/, and it gave information below: The following libraries have been found: BLAS_LIBS=-lblas LAPACK_LIBS

[Pw_forum] stress in CP vs PW, previously no subject

2006-02-16 Thread Eduardo Ariel Menendez P
Thank you Stefano for your prompt advise. I repeated the CP minimization commenting qcutz=150., q2sigma=2.0, ecfixed=24.0. I read that default value is ecfixed=40, which is larger than my cutoff for the wavefunction, then I guess that this does not affect the calculation. There is no much differe

[Pw_forum] Problem relaxing cluster

2006-02-16 Thread Lucas Fernandez Seivane
Now it works. Thanks! On 2/16/06, Andrea Dal Corso wrote: > On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 19:17 +0100, Lucas Fernandez Seivane wrote: > > Hi to all > > > > I am trying to relax a system of 2 atoms, but each time I do it I get > > IOS = 39 > > > > 2 > > > > %

[Pw_forum] about the convergence of ph.x

2006-02-16 Thread sun jason
dear all, I will very appreciate the one who help me about following question, the ph.x is not convergence when I calculate the second order response. the message is like this: Computing Second order response kpoint 4 ibnd 41 pcgreen: root not converged 0.274E+01 kpoint 4 ib

[Pw_forum] Problem relaxing cluster

2006-02-16 Thread Andrea Dal Corso
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 19:17 +0100, Lucas Fernandez Seivane wrote: > Hi to all > > I am trying to relax a system of 2 atoms, but each time I do it I get > IOS = 39 > > 2 > > %% > from davcio : error #10 >

[Pw_forum] Total number of d electrons of cobalt

2006-02-16 Thread degironc
Dear all, I also think that it is probably a typo. I corrected it in the CVS version. stefano Matteo Cococcioni wrote: > Dear Huiqun, > > I think you are right: the number of d electrons for Co should be set > to 7, not 9. Unless this was changed for some particular reason (that > I don