[Pw_forum] Problems with PH.X in QE-31

2006-07-12 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
On Tuesday 11 July 2006 04:29, Sigifredo Sanchez-Carrera wrote: > I compiled espresso-3.1 using an intel fortran compiler (IFC) on a > machine that has intel xeon processors. I had no problem with pw.x > using MPI for parallel use, but whe I try to use the ph.x program > after a few seconds the

[Pw_forum] about phonon calculation

2006-07-12 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
On Tuesday 11 July 2006 10:59, Ezad Shojaee wrote: > i have made a phonon calculation with a small grid (221) [...] > when i want to calculate the IFC's in the real space with q2r.x , > there is no dielectric tensor this is normal, if you do not explicitly require its calculation by ph.x (epsi

[Pw_forum] projwfc.x

2006-07-12 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
On Wednesday 12 July 2006 09:00, Alain Allouche wrote: > Running PROJWFC I often get the message: > from davcio : error #10 > i/o error in davcio > although the pw.x step worked allright, what is the problem ? it depends. The above error means that the code could not read s

[Pw_forum] Plot |psi|^2 for an arbitary k point

2006-07-12 Thread Tianshu Li
Dear PWSCF users and developers: In running post-processing pp.x, I got an error message "from local_dos : error # 1 k must be zero" when calculating |psi|^2 for a non-zero K point. I've searched the code "local_dos.F90" and find that the non-zero K point does not seem to be a

[Pw_forum] Input file for cp.x system of C(111)2x1: diagonalization failed

2006-07-12 Thread Tim Teatro
Hello all. Thank you in advance for your time. I have been trying to get a C or Si (111) 2x1 surface to work in cp for some time. I am using a small cluster, Intel processors (Itanium 32bit I think), IFC 9.0 with MKL. The version of cp.x I am working with is from ESPRESSO 3.1.1, although I have h

[Pw_forum] projwfc.x

2006-07-12 Thread Alain Allouche
Dear all, Running PROJWFC I often get the message: %% from davcio : error #10 i/o error in davcio %% although the

[Pw_forum] same Problem with BFGS

2006-07-12 Thread Stefano de Gironcoli
your scf convergence threshold (10^-4) looks very lousy to me. In particular it's larger than the required energy convergence in the bfgs relaxation (10^-5) !! Lousy self consitency affects the quality of the computed forces ... indeed the "scf correction" is larger that the force itself. stefan