--
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20090814/68f0f0e3/attachment.htm
chment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20090814/ad128d8c/attachment.htm
On Thursday 06 August 2009 18:31, dev sharma wrote:
> I have successfully calculated the band structure of my system. It is also
> matching the results. But when I plot my band structure in ps format only
> one line from conduction band and valance band is showing fluctuations.
> Means one line ,
Dear pwscf users,
Does anyone have generated the paw pseudo-potentials for Al and Ni with ld1
code? Would you share the ld1 input files?
Thank you in advance for your helps.
Best regards,
Nguyen Thanh Cuong
Phd student
School of Materials Science
Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Techno
On Friday 14 August 2009 07:55, Bipul Rakshit wrote:
> I am doing Gamma point phonon analysis for LaMnO3,
> after running matdyn.x i am getting the following, error.
you calculated phonons at q=0 only, so all you can and should
do is to run dynmat.x (not matdyn.x) to apply the acoustic sum
rule
Hey SaptariBshi,
You can find them in /pseudo directory under espresso, e.g.
espresso-4.0.4/pseudo
-Manoj Srivastava
University of Florida
Gainesville, FL
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009, Shaptrishi Sharma wrote:
> Hi Quantum espresso users,
>
> I need the following pseudopotential file for my simula
help and guide me , what does at mean and what is the possible
solution. ???
Thanks in advance
Dev sharma,
University of Delhi,
India
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20090814/633105b9
J. J. Ramsey wrote:
> - Original Message
>
>
>> From: Stefano de Gironcoli
>> To: PWSCF Forum
>> Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 11:59:14 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Pw_forum] Trying to clarify the dipole correction (again!)
>>
>> Dear J.J. Ramsey
>>
>> at variance with what is defined i
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum at pwscf.org
http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20090814/e9a7e156/attachment.htm
grep -e "ban band" */*.f90returns the following:
PP/epsilon.f90: IF ( REAL(nbnd, DP) <= nelec / 2.0_DP ) CALL
errore('epsilon', 'ban band number', 1)
I guess that this means you specified a too small value for nbnd.
I also guess that "ban" is a mispelling for "bad"
stefano
dev sharma wr
part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20090814/9aeba1c4/attachment.htm
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: lamno3.ph.in
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 316 bytes
dear Alvaro
0.003 Ry is about 50 meV ... a very small value, and 0.001 is even
smaller. this will require almost and infinity of k-points in order to
obtain converged results... and such a small value may make scf
convergence very difficult (unless very many k-points are used) because
fro
of electrons, so is their any
other probable reason?
Can anybody help?
Dimpy
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20090814/fab6c3db/attachment.htm
Dear Lihui Ou,
oulihui666 wrote:
> Dear all,
> Recently, I have been performing calulation of frequency and zero
> point energy of CO2 molecule. However, unfortunately, I have
> obtained negative frequency. According to the manual, there are several
>ibrav = 1,
>
And to see the final frequencies after applying sum rule.
>
> Kindly guide me and suggest for the possible reason for this error.
> --
> Dr. Bipul Rakshit
> Research Associate,
> S N Bose Centre for Basic Sciences,
> Salt Lake,
> Kolkata 700 098
> India
> -- next p
ord-attachments.html
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20090814/0600f411/attachment.htm
Alvaro:
> Hello I am doing a scf calculation system and uses degauss = 0.003
i.e. 40 mev
> and needed change it paar 0001.
i.e. 1.3 mev, very small indeed
> With this new value, the calculation does not converge. What may be
> happening?
I can only imagine you are using Gaussian smearing fo
17 matches
Mail list logo