achment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20090817/9d2c2164/attachment.htm
tion? Find it on Yahoo! Local
http://in.local.yahoo.com/
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20090817/4bb42d40/attachment.htm
Hi Gabriele,
I am sorry. Before, there are usually the words "spin up" and "spin down"
in the spin polarization cases. I did not see it this time, so I thought
something was wrong here. When I looked at the band data again, I saw the
number of eigen values are double there, which means one for e
|
> | phone: +39 040 3787 511 |
> | skype: gurlonotturno |
> o o
> ___
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: si.in
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1089 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20090817/055b6107/attachment-0001.obj
Dear users of quantum espresso
I ask you any help about the next error message:
---
nfiekinc temph temppetot entha
On Monday 17 August 2009 10:27, Dimpy Sharma wrote:
> Thanks for your help, however I did not need these Pseudopotentials as I
> already have these ( Si.pz-vbc.UPF and H.pz-vbc.UPF ).
they are EXACTLY THE SAME as those you need. *.pz-vbc.UPF is the
correct naming convention.
> I need the follow
In data 17 agosto 2009 alle ore 10:27:21, Dimpy Sharma
ha scritto:
> Si 28.08600 Si.vbc.UPF
>H1.00800 H.vbc.UPF
You can just rename the file, or change the input. The name of the
pseudopotential does not matter, what matter is what's inside (and results
should
w.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20090817/88a95320/attachment.obj
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20090815/4ae8319d/attachment.htm
--
___
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum at pwscf.org
http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
End of Pw_forum Digest, Vol 26, Issue 44
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 7890 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20090817/a8dbd767/attachment-0001.bin
Dear user,
vtmtrinh at caltech.edu wrote:
> Dear PWSCF Users,
>
> Does any of you know how to calculate spin splitting using QE? More
> clearly, if I have 2 structures (Si 8-atom cell), one at equilibrium and
> the other one with atoms being displced according to phonon mode. I would
> like cal
Dear Lihui,
oulihui666 wrote:
> Dear Gabriele Sclauzero,
> I am intend to calculate the frequency of CO2 molecule, so I should
> perform scf calculation at first, when setting k points as gamma, it
> will appear a error in the process of calculating frequency, as follows:
> ***
> (5) > matdyn.x < phdos.in (Calculating phonon density of states)
> and this will produce a file called "Al.phdos" which contains the
> phonon density of states. Now by typing:
> awk '{e=e+2*1/2}END{print e/33.357*4.1357/1000}' Al.phdos
Dear Lihui,
I would be careful in getting quantities vi
Hi Nicola,
> --- On Mon, 8/17/09, Nicola Marzari wrote:
> Question for Eyvaz - does the qha code do the integrals in
> reciprocal space, or via the pdos ?
QHA calculates zero point energy (and others, too) via pdos. It is rather
straightforward, and I did not see any considerable deviation f
Dear Neel,
there is no difference. You can specify the size of your unit cell using
different units of measure, but provided you
convert your units correctly, you will of course have the same unit
cell, and same computational cost.
Of course you can use larger cells that contain multiples of
I am sorry I forgot to mention the value of 'eps', it is 1.d-8.
Thanks,
Manoj Srivastava
University of Florida
Gainesville, FL
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Dear Alexander and PWSCF users,
> I have a question about an expression in the scatter_forw.f90 subroutine,
> specificall
15 matches
Mail list logo