Dear Dev,
I also have never used this feature of the code but Doc directory has
useful documents when you need answers: Doc/eps_man.tex
It is clearly stated there that "the non-local contribution due to the
pseudopotential is neglected. Actually the correction to the matrix
element that take
he error message "LSDA
not available with electric field" seems a little bit confusing to me.
Thank you very much.
Hanghui
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20090927/4dd889af/attachment.htm
field or it is just that this function is not implemented in QE.
Thank you very much.
Hanghui Chen
Department of Physics
Yale University
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20090927/a09bbf63
+ MTech
Physics Dept
IIT Bombay
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20090927/445802d3/attachment.htm
democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> --
> Duy Le
> PhD Student
> Department of Physics
> University of Central Florida.
>
> ___
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20090927/c819a9bc/attachment.htm
Dear Sreekar,
Could you please clarify why, in your opinion, energy/(unit cell
volume) vs (unit cell volume) should give the minimum but not energy
vs (unit cell volume)? Since you are trying to find the gs lattice
constant, I am assuming you consider harmonic approximation around gs
lattice