Hi Paul,
________________________________ From: W2AGZ <w2...@w2agz.com> >My bad (mea culpa). I thought I had inserted the ?new Fortran code? you sent >me >a >few months ago, but on replacement and ?make,? I must have screwed up >>something...I?ll check. Please check it. >In the meantime, you state the new matdyn.x ?replaces all the old stuff, e.g. >>lambda.x? used in example07. Is there an ?updated example07? that >>illustrates >the >new methodology? I follow the path illustrated in example07 a fair >amount >in my >attempts to simulate electron-phonon mediated Eliashberg-McMillan >pairing. > No, I will update this example. Thanks bringing this inconsistency to our attention. But lambda.f90 should work. >Last September you sent me a tar-file with the f90 code for elphon, lambda, >>matdyn, phcom and qr2 along with matdyn.in.dos and qr2.in. I take it all are >>required to ?fix? example07? Or just matdyn? I see the two text input files >must be >?plugged into? run_example because of the new nsig flag. Anyway, >I?ll >see if I can >get the ?old? example07 to work. I suppose you should take all these files. "nsig" by default is 10. But these files were tested for 4.2 version. >BTW, I?ve observed one can have gfortran compiler issues with example07...go >to >>http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/2010-March/016356.html Fortunately, I have never got such kind misbehavior of the code due to a compiler. For me the code always worked smoothly. Only once I got very unusual lambda's, but it was due to a system error, as when I restarted it was OK. >I note phq_readin still contains the error message 'The phonon code with LDA+U >is >not yet available.' Any idea when it might be available? I would be a >very >willing >beta tester. As far as I remember Matteo C. said "phonons with LDA+U" is almost ready, but still there are some problems, I guess. Sorry, but I am the first in the queue list. Let us ask Matteo again about this opportunity. >BTW (again), I?m having occasional iotk problems running the PH code on both >4.0 >>and 4.2.1...see my original forum posting at >>http://www.democritos.it/pipermail >/pw_forum/2010-March/016356.htmland Paolo?s reply >http://www.democritos.it/pipermail >/pw_forum/2010-December/018852.html Sorry, but the first link was posted by Miguel, not you. Nevertheless, I remember. Have you tried g95? Bests, Eyvaz. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20101212/3309a095/attachment.htm
