Dear users
I have been trying to relax a graphene structure with a vacancy but
many erros stoped optimization and convergence not achieved.like
1. Efermy cannot braket :
2. to0 many bands not coveraged
for solving the errors I have chenged these parametrs
increasing ecutoff to 60 and ecuthro to
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 15:04 +0100, Davide Tiana wrote:
> Application 1981542 exit codes: 139
> Application 1981542 exit signals: Killed
it looks like an out-of-bounds memory error
> Any suggestion?
0) the usual suggestions apply:
http://www.quantum-espresso.org/?page_id=26#2.0
1) locate wher
tate Physics,the Chinese Academy of Sciences,
P.O.Box 1129, Hefei 230031, P.R.China
Tel: 86-551-5591464-326(office)
Fax: 86-551-5591434
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20120427/ebad4973/attachment.htm
Dear all,
After optimised a molecule I tried to calculate the band structure but
pw crashes and I can't figure out why.
The optimisation step should be fine(here it converge immediately
since I rerun my previous calculation):
BFGS Geometry Optimization
bfgs converged in 1 scf cy
Dear Nicola,
Many thanks for the prompt reply.
> first question - would mp work?
This we haven't tried. Since mv and mp give very similar numerical results
for a given smearing width I guess I thought I should try something a bit
different, i.e. gauss.
> In terms of "structure" of the smearing
Dear all
whether the number of k-points in final result of relax is effective?
Dear PWSCF community,
While we are on the subject of convergence, I would like to inquire about
something that we have consistently been observing in a very large number
of the systems we have studied (examples being metal atoms on g-Al2O3, CeO2
surfaces etc). While gaussian smearing consistently
Hi Hande,
first question - would mp work?
In terms of "structure" of the smearing function, gaussian is
the smoothest, then mv, then mp. So if there were an intrinsic problem
with states at the fermi energy, it should be even more apparent in
mp .
As a general comment, the role of smearing is
On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 02:10 -0400, Ajit Vallabhaneni wrote:
> I want to know whether the format for k points output by kpoints.x
> is tpiba or not ?
I think so. This is something you can easily verify
P.
--
Paolo Giannozzi, IOM-Democritos and University of Udine, Italy
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 09:20 +0800, Cao TF wrote:
> The problem is that when I let hydrogen atoms adsorb on the N atoms,
> the calculation is hard to converge.
you should start with a smaller, more manageable calculation,
experiment a bit with parameters. It is hard to say anything
for a relativel
State Physics,the Chinese Academy of Sciences,
P.O.Box 1129, Hefei 230031, P.R.China
Tel: 86-551-5591464-326(office)
Fax: 86-551-5591434
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20120427/936a23a2/attachment.htm
11 matches
Mail list logo