Dear All,
I'm trying to submit a NEB calculation on the Mn3/4Co1/4PO4 system to
calculate the Lithium energy barrier for diffusion. The baseline
calculation on MnPO4 went fine.
Inserting the cobalt atoms neb.x crashes during the calculation on the
second image.
No error is printed in the log but
Dear Quantum ESPRESSO users,
we are happy to announce that AiiDA - a materials' informatics Python
platform to manage, store, organize, query and share large amounts of
data, calculations, and workflows - has been recently released and can
be freely downloaded from the website
Dear all,
please somebody help me get a supercell of 100 atoms in pwi format
from the attached cif file.
Kind regards
Mulwa Winfred.
D Phil Student, Computational Material Science Group,
University of the Free State - QwaQwa,
South Africa.
win3.cif
Description:
Re: Pw_forum Digest, Vol 95, Issue 11 ( total magnetization and absolute
magnetization quenched)
Dear Prof Paolo,
Thank you for your swift response. Although I do not completely capture your
response " they use different pseudopotentials and k-points" but am optimistic
to learn more as to the
Respected Sir/Mam,
I am working on optical properties.
I have run dynmat.x file and obtained the output below:
# mode [cm-1][THz] IR Raman depol.fact
1 -487.60 -14.6178 37.7287 277.86090.6461
2 -0.00 -0.0.334597.41700.7437
Dear QE users,
I want to project the density of states of complete system (molecule
adsorbed on a surface) on to molecular orbitals of adsorbate and find
population of different molecular orbitals. If I understood correctly there
is an post-processing tool molecularpdos.x in quantum ESPRESSO v
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Yusuf Zuntu wrote:
Input files for relax and scf attached.
>
they use different pseudopotentials and k-points
P.
--
Paolo Giannozzi, Dept. Chemistry,
Univ. Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy
hone +39-0432-558216, fax
Topic:
total magnetization and absolute
magnetization quenched.
Dear Quantum Espresso users,
Can some one bail me out of this problem. In trying to repeat some calculations
of this article
"http://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.197207;, an
unexpected magnetic behavior
On Sat, 2015-06-13 at 16:38 +0100, Samuel Poncé wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I found out that it was impossible de make a phonon calculation without
> calculating the Born effective charge in a semi-conductor even if we set
> epsil = .false.
>
> This is due to the routine prepare_q.f90 that is called