q2r is not parallel, the first instance worked but al lthe other ones did not
get any input
--
Dr. Lorenzo Paulatto
IdR @ IMPMC -- CNRS & Université Paris 6
+33 (0)1 44 275 084 / skype: paulatz
http://www.impmc.upmc.fr/~paulatto/
23-24/4é16 Boîte courrier 115
4 place Jussieu 75252 Paris Cédex
Thank you so much for clear explanations.
Best,
Mohammad
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Giovanni Cantele <
giovanni.cant...@spin.cnr.it> wrote:
> the iflag variable, as far as I remember, is needed only to convert what
> is computed as specified in the INPUTPP name list in a format that cam b
Hello,
I'm confusing, I need to do some convergence test, but I don't know if I
need primitive or one unit cell and how to select it.
I'm using this structure http://www.crystallography.net/cod/1513984.html
I extracted the crystallographic translation. The cell formula units are 8,
has 56 atoms.
Try to run on one processor only. q2r.x should do that anyway, no matter
how many processors you specified (it is not parallelized) but this
sentence:
"Primary job terminated normally, but 1 process returned a non-zero
exit code"
seems to indicate that it doesn't
Paolo
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at
Hello,
I want to calculate phonon dispersion and phonon DOS for BaFe2As2
I receive the folllowing error message when using the q2r executable:
...
...
q= -0.3000 0.49640224 0.12917893
q= 0.3000 -0.49640224 -0.12917893
reading force constants from file BaFe2As2_20K.dyn12
Thank you for reply??
But i still don't konw how to use the 'dynmat.x' to get the raman tensor of
every phonon mode. Which parameter should be used?
and what the relationship of the Raman cross sections and the raman tensor?
Can you describe in detail? this problem have puzzled me nearly one w
Dear Rahman
>Could you plz let me know why I am facing this problem whenever I try the
>band structure of any material and I will have these crossing lines.
Maybe, you can get ride of these crossing lines by using :
no_overlap=.true.
option in the inbut of bands.x . Please see
http://www.quantu
Auxiliary code "dynmat.x" computes Raman cross sections for each phonon,
for a specific backscattering geometry.
Paolo
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 3:27 PM, 肖瑞春 wrote:
> Hello everyone!
> I'm studing the tutorial of Raman(example05 in PHonon) , I got the raman
> tenor of every atom, but we know tha
Hello everyone!
I'm studing the tutorial of Raman(example05 in PHonon) , I got the raman
tenor of every atom, but we know that the raman intensities are calculated by
the raman tensor of every phonon mode. So my qusetion is where is the raman
tensor of every phonon mode in the output files ?
Dear Maseen
if you have this lattice vectors
CELL_PARAMETERS {angstrom}
4.936344760.0.
2.468172384.27540.
0.0.12.
why do you put the o
Dear Elliot,
I don’t remember If I’ve ever used those pseudo potentials, especially that for
nickel. However, they are ultrasoft, so
the convergence should be rather fast with respect to the cutoff.
In any case this is only a general indication, you need to make tests of the
properties you wan
Dear Giovanni,
I'm using working with CO adsorbing on Nickel and these are the PPs I'm
using: Ni.pbe-nd-rrkjus.UPF
C.pbe-rrkjus.UPF
O.pbe-rrkjus.UPF
Any more information with this added info would be appreciated.
Thank you.
Kind Regards
Elliot.
> Message: 4 Date: Mon, 6 Jul
FYI the latest version of QE is 5.2.0. See
http://qe-forge.org/gf/project/q-e/frs/?action=FrsReleaseView&release_id=195
F
On Jul 3, 2015, at 11:06 AM, Rajdeep Banerjee wrote:
> Dear Prof. Paolo Giannozzi,
> ok, I'll run it in espresso-5.1.1
> and get ba
the iflag variable, as far as I remember, is needed only to convert what is
computed as specified in the INPUTPP name list in a format that cam be
visualised using different graphic tools (such as gunplay, XCrysDen, and so on).
If you what to use average.x you only need the file containing the c
On Sunday, July 05, 2015 10:22:17 PM Elliot Menkah wrote:
> For instance if you used 60Ry to compute 'delta H' for reactants and you
> use 40Ry to compute 'delta H' for products.
>
Dear Elliott,
I do not understand too well what you mean. If you have a system that
converges at 40Ry but not at 60
> On 05 Jul 2015, at 18:29, Gul Rahman wrote:
>
> Dear All,
> I am doing some test calculations on 2D Sn and comparing QE with SIESTA. Both
> QE and SIESTA almost give the same results (DOS, lattice constnat, charge,,).
> However, I have problem with the band structure. I want to plot the ban
Dear Elliot,
the answer could be: generally speaking, results should change not so much
because energy differences are known to converge quite rapidly with respect to
the cutoff . However, no answer could be given without more details.
Indeed, the change of the properties with respect to ecutwf
17 matches
Mail list logo