65 is not one of the error codes set by pw.x IIRC. See the header of
PW/src/run_pwscf.f90 for other return codes.
Paolo
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 5:27 AM, Parham Shenavar wrote:
> Hello all
>
> I cannot find the list of exit codes descriptions issued by pw.x program.
> For
Hello QE users,I have an interface between semiconductor and semi-metallic. The
system along z-direction is 30 A in length, I need to apply a saw-like electric
field along that direction. So the z-direction enlarged by extra 15 A as vacuum
and I added 2Dxy to fix the whole system along the
Hello all
I cannot find the list of exit codes descriptions issued by pw.x program.
For example my run was exited with exit code 65 yesterday. Is there
documentation on this topic?
Thank you
Parham
___
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org
what is "error in routine adiaghg(707): problem calculating cholesky"? How
it can be resolved? It arises after 7 cycles of relax calculation.
___
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
Dear all,
I am now calculating the DOS of CsPbI3 using espresso-5.2.0 and would like
to know the contribution of each atom. I succeeded in the calculation of
Pb2+ and I3-, but I failed when I proceeded Cs+ nscf calculation.
The error was as written on the title:
Error in routine read_rho_xml
Thank you for reporting this. I think it was fixed a few days ago in rev.
11881:
http://www.qe-forge.org/gf/project/q-e/scmsvn/?action=browse=%2Ftrunk%2Fespresso%2FFFTXlib%2Ffftw.h=rev=log
Paolo
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Reinaldo Pis Diez <
reinaldo.pisd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear
Dear folks,
I'm a new QE user. I've searched the forum archives for similar
problems but I was unable to find something useful to me.
I'm compiling QE 5.2.1 in a linux cluster running CentOS 6.6 (gcc
and gfortran 4.4.7). I've already installed openmpi 1.6.5 and ATLAS
3.8.2 with full Lapack
Dear Colleagues,
We would like to draw your attention to the CPMD2016 workshop:
Car-Parrinello Molecular Dynamics in 2016
May 18-20, 2016
The University of Chicago, Chicago, USA
http://www.cpmd2016-conference.org
Ab initio or Car-Parrinello Molecular Dynamics (CPMD) has become a widespread
Thank you very much.
> Sorry it is the 0.866025 in cell parameters that has too few digits. It
> should be \sqrt{3}/2. 0.8660254 is sufficient in my PC to find the
> correct classes.
>
> Andrea
>
> On Tue, 2015-12-15 at 17:19 +0530, Surender wrote:
>> Dear Andrea,
>> Thank you for your reply, as
Kondrin, thank you so much for your quick response. But I want to discuss
some more things. I need only bulk modulus not shear modulus. Instead
I need deformation potential also.
So your suggestion of calculating the bulk modulus from the energy difference
between the optimized structure at normal
Thank you for reporting this. It is already fixed in the current
development version (and soon-to-be-released stable version)
Paolo
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 8:52 AM, hushujun wrote:
> Dear QE developers:
>
> When I calculate the pdos using projwfc.x, I get the following
11 matches
Mail list logo