Dear Giovanni Cantele,
Thank you once again. Also, there seems to be a typo in the example for
workfunctions in PP/examples. The example states that the workfunction
calculation is for Al100. However, its idir is set to 3. I think it should
be Al001 instead. Lastly, I will check the units and put
Dear all QE users and developers,
I want to run my simulations using hybrid functional however, I don't know how
to specify it in my input file. Any help would be thoroughly appreciated.
Best,
Amir M. Mofrad
University of Missouri
___
Pw_forum
Currently, 255, at least for PWscf:
!
SUBROUTINE run_pwscf ( exit_status )
!
!
! ... Run an instance of the Plane Wave Self-Consistent Field
Dear all,
I want to write a script that would automatically restart a job if maximum
time limit has reached for that I need to now what is value returned to
the operating system by pw.x once the time limit has exceeded.
Thanks,
Sayan
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous
Hello developers,
Here are a some more patches, for the configure script.
David Strubbe
MIT
There is simply a mistaken comment in configure.ac.
--- install/configure.ac.orig 2016-04-21 13:55:47.0 -0400
+++ install/configure.ac2016-04-21 13:56:05.0 -0400
@@ -36,7 +36,7
Thanks you. I will look into this examples
Manuel
2016-05-13 8:28 GMT-03:00 Davide Ceresoli :
> Dear Manuel,
> you can find info, examples and postprocessing
> options at: http://www.cecam.org/workshop-0-868.html
>
> Best,
> D.
>
> On 05/12/2016 09:14 PM, Manuel
Dear Gangotri Dey
> "Error in routine phq_readin (1):
> no elec. field with metals"
You are probably using occupations=smearing in your pw.x calculations.
If I remember well, the ph.x code stops and complains because it is
not able to perform IR and Raman calculations on what could be
Dear All,
Recently I am working on Iridium based sample(CaIrO3).But the problem
is about convergence issue.It is taking 100 iteration by default .so
obviously it is wrong.I am using Full Relativistic Pseudopotential for
Ir.I have tried with different mixing bita from .1 to .7 but the problems
> On 17 May 2016, at 19:28, rojib raj wrote:
>
> dear altruists,
> while finding band structure for bilayer graphene, I used "ibrav=4"
> now can somebody tell me why we use the value of ibrav =4 ???
> I think this value indicates 3D structure of graphene which is actually
> On 18 May 2016, at 09:54, Dae Kwang Jun wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I would like to make sure whether I am using these parameters correctly. I
> know that idir is the fixed index which defines the planes of the planar
> average. I also know that awin is the size of the
Dear all,
I would like to make sure whether I am using these parameters correctly. I
know that idir is the fixed index which defines the planes of the planar
average. I also know that awin is the size of the window for macroscopic
averages.
However, I do not quite understand what is meant by
11 matches
Mail list logo