Thanks for the reply.
So just to be clear, i should:
1)Generate a pseudopotential using the optB86b functional
2)Generate the vdw_kernel_table
3)Specify vdw-df-ob86 in input_dft
Is that correct?
Thanks again
Aldo Ugolotti a écrit :
> You also have to run, just
Thank you so much!
Yue
___
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
On Wednesday, 27 July 2016 01:16:34 CEST Vo, Trinh (398K) wrote:
> Dear Dr. Paulatto,
>
> Thank you very much for the information.
>
> I am interested in using this code and would like to download it. However,
> it asked for logging in. Does it require to register for an account to
> download
You also have to run, just for the first time, the command:
generate_vdW_kernel_table.x
that will create the database of input functionals and i guess that you
have to copy the database in your local pseudopotential files directory
Good luck,
Aldo Ugolotti
Università degli Studi di
Dear ZARA (or NBSH, WBR, NN ?)
as mentioned in some of the other answers you need to find the shift
of the average electrostatic potential (the internal reference of the
calculation) to the vacuum level.
If your system is 0 dimensional then the assume_isolated option may
be helpful.
In
On Tuesday, 26 July 2016 20:15:34 CEST ZARA NBSH wrote:
> Dear users,
> I would like to calculate the highest occupied state energy of a
> nano-structure with respect to the vacuum level.
>
> I took vacuum about 20A, if I increase the vacuum the total energy and gap
> do not change but the
One more information,
I have used 1.0d-10 SCF convergence threshold.
Should I decrease alpha_mix? I guess increasing tr2_ph is quite a bad idea,
though I have done that by setting it to 1.0d-10.
Best regards
Subhodip
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 3:21 AM, Subhodip Chatterjee