On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 11:39 PM, ashkan shekaari wrote:
> Dear experts,
>
>
> Once a CPMD simulation at zero pressure, constant volume, and at a finite
> temperature (say, T=70 K) is performed (temperature is kept constant by
> rescaling the nuclear degrees of freedom), what
Dear experts,
Once a CPMD simulation at zero pressure, constant volume, and at a finite
temperature (say, T=70 K) is performed (temperature is kept constant by
rescaling the nuclear degrees of freedom), what kind of MD (NVE, or, NPT)
is going to be used?
Regards,
Ashkan
*Ashkan Shekaari*
I am not expert in this but i can suggest few things try conv_thr=10^-8
and use ion/cell_dynamics=bfgs. Also which direction you want to move the
atoms?. I mean cell_dofree?. all the xyz direction?
Hope it helps you.
Manu
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 12:35 PM, WANG YUANQING
Dear QE users,
I am trying to optimize the crystal structure of K2V8O21. The input file is
given below. I tried many different sets (vc-realx and relax. constrained or
not), or optimization algorithm (BFGS or damp). However, I cannot get
converged result. Can someone give me some suggestions?
I cannot reproduce your problem. Paolo
Il 04/gen/2017 10:53 PM, "Eduardo Cisternas"
ha scritto:
> Dear QE community:
>
> After suceesfull Car-Parrinello calculations in QE v.6.0 for thiols/Au111
> surface I wanted to obtain STM images for this system.
>
> My
Dear Davide
Yes, the procedure is correct, and you can easily compare the results
with those obtained in a GTO framework. If you neglect/minimize basis
sets issues, pseudopotentials issues, numerical noise, etc., you
generally obtain close eigenvalues in PW/GTO frameworks, using the
same
Dear all
I would like to check I am doing the correct things.
I need to compare the eigenvalues of some atoms and molecules.
I am following this procedure:
1) pw in a cube cell bigger enough to exclude any interaction with its
neighbours.
2) adding the "assume_isolated='makov-payne'"
Dear Giuseppe,
Very thanks for your advice!
For the points b) and e), actually I am mainly focused on the wavefunctions in
SCF calculations, is there any change in your recommended values?
Best wishes!
Jiqiang
在 2017-01-05 21:30:51,"Giuseppe Mattioli"
Dear QE users:
When I run pp.x I get the error
%%%
error opening d2tiofeno_f_74.wc1
%%%
and not ..._72.wc1 as I stated in my question.
Sorry for this mistake.
Cheers,
Eduardo Cisternas
2017-01-04 18:52 GMT-03:00 Eduardo
Yes, those are "Megabytes", not "Megabits"
Paolo
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 12:25 AM, Jun Jiang wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I was running the qe6.0 (pw.x)
> I find the memory usage estimate in the output files like below
> "
>
> Estimated max dynamical RAM per process > 3207.98Mb
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Giuseppe Mattioli <
giuseppe.matti...@ism.cnr.it> wrote:
> i) disk_io = 'none'. Dangerous. It could hinder a proper restart of
> your calculation.
>
it used to, but it should no longer have any adverse effect on restart (as
long as the running code is stopped
Sorry, in my previous post:
b) ecutfock is a very useful handle that reduces the ecutrho fft grid
in the case of exact exchange calculations. You should play around to
find convergence, but in my experience (-->) ecutfock=ecutwfc yields
satisfactory geometry optimizations, and (-->)
Dear Jiqiang Li
EXX calculations *are* expensive. First of all read this file:
your-path-to-QE/Examples/PW/EXX_example/README
This said, you can use a couple of speedup tricks:
a) The Adaptively Compressed Exchange (ACE) algorithm is implemented
in QE 6.0. EXX is computed with ACE if you add
Dear Quantum Espresso users,
When I did a HSE calculation, I found it was very expensive. I am not
sure whether I did it in the right way, and could anyone give me some advice on
the speeding up the calculation?
The following is my input file. Thank you for your consideration!
Best
14 matches
Mail list logo