mailto:Pw_forum%40pwscf.org]
>> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
[http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum]
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Amel Shamseldeen Ali Alhassan
> Lecturer
> Nile College
> Khartoum, Sudan
> +249 915382411
>
--
Amel Shamseldeen Ali Alhassa
Hi Marton,
Yes, I am aware of that. I think there is a issue with nspin=2, nspin=1 is
totally fine.
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 11:15 PM, Marton wrote:
> Hi Jia,
>
> I don't think there is a bug there. If you go a few lines above in the
> same file, you find, for example:
>
> IF
Please see this paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0504077
It contains a good description of the QE implementation of electron-phonon
calculation from DFPT.
The second step can save a lot of computational time. This method is
described in the paper mentioned above
On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at
Hi Jia,
I don't think there is a bug there. If you go a few lines above in the same
file, you find, for example:
IF ( nspin == 1) full_occ = 2.0d0
which means that full_occ takes care of the occupations.
HTH
Marton Voros
--
Aneesur Rahman Fellow
Materials Science Division
Argonne National
Hello all,
I would like to plot a 2D electron density of a MOF structure along the xz
plane and have the x axis as the negative plane. I am using iflag=2 and
output format=8 as described in the manual. I was wondering how I can
change my e1(1),e1(2),e1(3) etc values to reflect that please?
Dear All,
I am suspicious that a bud exit in epsilon.f90 qe-6.0. The check of nbnd:
===
IF ( REAL(nbnd,DP)*full_occ <= nelec ) CALL errore('epsilon', 'bad band
number', 1)
===
I think it should
Dear All,
I have two questions regarding the calculations of electron-phonon
interaction coefficients as described in the user guide:
http://www.quantum-espresso.org/wp-content/uploads/Doc/ph_
user_guide/node9.html
1. Is the second step, i.e. the step using a coarse k-point grid for SCF