Re: [QE-users] dipole correction - "saggy" electrostatic potential?

2018-06-28 Thread Dr. Thomas Brumme
Dear Chris, The potential shows the typical quadratic dependence on z since you're calculating a charged system - there is a homogeneous background charge since the 3D pbc system is assumed to be neutral. This has nothing to do with the dipole correction. Depending on what you want to do

[QE-users] Issue in restarting QE calculation

2018-06-28 Thread Marcos VerĂ­ssimo Alves
Dear all, I am running a calculation for a Fe atom on a Cu2N/Cu(100) surface, initially relaxing it without spin polarization, using QE 5.3.0 (which is the version compiled in the cluster I'm currently using). I initially ran it on 700 cores, and restarted it on 1000. The geometry is read correctl

[QE-users] Bands.x calculation in QE-GPU

2018-06-28 Thread DongKyu Lee
Dear all, I want to know how to do band calculation after scf calculation using QE-gpu. I know qe-gpu does not have bands.x. I tried to turn the result of the QE-GPU to the CPU version QE. However, since the 'xml' format of QE-gpu and regular QE is different, I got a segmentation fault massage. H

Re: [QE-users] dipole correction - "saggy" electrostatic potential?

2018-06-28 Thread Christoph Wolf
Dear Thomas, thank you for your explanation. I am now curious why this does not seem to effect my VASP calculation but I guess I have to ascribed it to different implementations of either the dipole correction or how the background is treated... AS VASP only allows to charge "cubic cells" I guess

Re: [QE-users] Bands.x calculation in QE-GPU

2018-06-28 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 5:07 PM, DongKyu Lee wrote: > > since the 'xml' format of QE-gpu and regular QE is different > There are two formats currently, selected at compile time with preprocessng options -D__OLDXML. Please verify that the GPU and non-GPU code use the same format. Paolo > Dongk