Hi All,
I am working on a system where I want to implement constrained magnetism and I
don't understand what the relation between the starting_magnetization(i) value
and actual magnetic moment on site i is. I read here
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/2011-March/019612.html th
Hi Paolo,
Thanks, I checked again and my basis set cutoff was too low and now the two
agree.
Best,
Felix Frontini
From: users on behalf of Paolo
Giannozzi
Sent: May 26, 2020 12:09 PM
To: Quantum ESPRESSO users Forum
Subject: Re: [QE-users] Non-collinear magne
Dear All,
Can someone please explain to me why it is not possible to use vdW-BEEF
function with nspin=2 ?
it works only with nspin=1
taking into consideration that my system (CoP) is paramagnetic so putting
nspin=1 is not correct.
Thanks
Malathe
___
Quan
+ ferrariruffino.fz@ Fabrizio, It seems I made a mistake but cannot figure out where. Because I cannot reproduce it. Anyway, you are correct - both 'input_dft = "scan"' and 'input_dft = "MGGA_X_SCAN + MGGA_C_SCAN" result in the same indexes:from PW output: Exchange-correlation= MGGA_X_SCAN + MGGA
Hi qe user,
the fake method does not work in qe don't spend time to work on it. The
best way is wannier method.
good luck,
Kamel
Am Do., 28. Mai 2020 um 08:47 Uhr schrieb Shivesh Sivakumar <
shiveshsivaku...@gmail.com>:
> Dear users,
>
> As I gather that hybrid functional bandstructures (like t
Dear users,
As I gather that hybrid functional bandstructures (like that of HSE06)
cannot be plotted in the traditional way in QE, I'm looking at other
options. I was wondering if the 'fake scf' procedure (similar to the one in
VASP) works in QE? Where we manually add the k-points grid to the end