Hi Iurii,
Thanks for your prompt reply. Here they are:
1.PW
--
&CONTROL
title = 'POSCAR_Ce_alpha_supercell'
calculation = 'relax'
restart_mode = 'from_scratch'
outdir =
Dear Oliviero,
a question related to this discussion: if I use Environ just to add the
solvent effect and ESM for the electrostatic, how should I evaluate the
electrostatic potential at the center of the vacuum region? Should I use
pp.x? Or also in that case environ generate the cube files with the
Could you provide the input and output files for PW and HP calculations?
Greetings,
Iurii
--
Dr. Iurii Timrov
Postdoctoral Researcher
STI - IMX - THEOS and NCCR - MARVEL
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL)
CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
+41 21 69 34 881
http://people.epfl.ch/2653
Hello,
I am trying to compute Hubbard U using hp.x for Cerium, however, it seems
that after few iterations the code stopped with the following message:
atom # 1 q point # 1 iter # 395
Fermi energy shift (Ry) = -0.5530E+01 -0.2375E-07
WARNING: The Fermi energy shift is too
Hello,
I am performing a relaxation calculation on a tungsten nitride catalyst
with molecules that are adsorbing on its surface. My system is difficult to
converge, and since I added the adsorbed molecules it has not been
converging (scf calculations converge, it's just the relaxation
calculation)
Hello,
I am looking for someone that is skilled in quantum espresso and that can
model CH4 conversion to C2H4 on a tungsten nitride catalyst (find the
adsorption energies of the intermediates on the slab, find the reaction
pathway, the activation barriers and the reaction energies). It is going to
Dear Quantum Espresso users
I was wondering if anybody knows how to find the electron-phonon coupling
constant for Al. I shared my question before, however still didn't get any idea
or comment. This is a gentle reminder.
Thank you very much,
From: users on
Hello,
We have Intel(R) Xeon Phi(TM) CPU 7210 @ 1.30GHz processor and we want
to run quantum espresso 6.5 with
Intel(R) MPI Library for Linux* OS, Version 2019 Update 8. We are using
Slurm Workload Manager and when we want to submit a job in three nodes
and using 192 cores (64x3 ), we encount
1, As degauss has quite an effect on the band energies (and 0.1 is
fairly large),
i suggest you check its effect for a smaller test system (with
similar elements).
2, When you change the no. of k points do you mean the SCF run?
I think that convergence is better when both cut-off energy an
Dear all,
When I was given the "make gipaw" command I found the following errors as
below.
I couldn't find the source of it. Please do the needful.
sky@sky-Lenovo-B460e:~/q-e-qe-6.5$ make gipaw
test -d bin || mkdir bin
( cd clib ; make TLDEPS= all || exit 1 )
make[1]: Entering directory '/home/s
Hello dear experts,
Hope you are doing well.
I was trying to calculate the DOS in hexagonal Cr2O3, the DOS is coming
very well with a bandgap of 3.09, but the problem is the Fermi level is at
the edge of LUMO whereas I've observed that it should be at HUMO edge in
few already published papers.
I u
Dear Timofey
Yes the compensation is between the Hartree term and the Ewald sum works
independently from the functional.
Hopefully energy values should not be completely different, just small
differences which should decrease with the distance.
About using the Makov-Payne corrections directl
Thank you so much sir for the clarification.
Actually I am interested in performing adsorption on Cr2O3 slab, so before
forming a surface I wanted to check the bulk unit cell, so that I am
assured that I will be choosing the appropriate bulk structure for slab
formation.
And for adsorption part,
I am not sure I have understood what the problem is.
If all you need is the plot of the density of states and want to set in the
plot the position of the Fermi level, my suggestion, this being an insulator,
is to avoid to indicate a value for the Fermi level, just put a VBT ( valence
band to
14 matches
Mail list logo