[QE-users] Doubt in performing vc relax and relax - Reg

2021-04-17 Thread singaravelan T R
Dear all, I think vc - relax and relax are nearly the same things by following arguments. If wrong please correct me. In case of relax calculation, we check for atomic position optimization, and then separately do the lattice parameter vs total energy by running scf, Optimization. But in case of

Re: [QE-users] Re?? Error happens after setting max_seconds in turbo_davidson.x

2021-04-17 Thread Iurii TIMROV via users
Dear Weijie, I have run a test using QE6.7 and your inputs with reduced parameters on my workstations using 8 cores. The code works fine, the restart files are written successfully when the turbo_davidson.x code reached max_seconds. Below are my inputs, you can try them as well. Please check

Re: [QE-users] Spin components in pp - plot

2021-04-17 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
Yes, it makes sense. A quick look inside the code (PP/src/punch_plot.f90) shows the same behavior for the charge density minus the atomic charge density (punch_plot=9) and for the charge density (punch_plot=0) Paolo On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 5:45 PM Ian Shuttleworth wrote: > Dear all > > Does th

Re: [QE-users] Calculation Error with pw.x on compute Canada cluster

2021-04-17 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 8:15 AM Rutika Savaliya < rutika.saval...@mail.mcgill.ca> wrote: My calculation starts and ends abrutly after 2 or 3 iterations. I wanted to > know if the issue is regarding my input file or the version of quantum > espresso. > most likely, none of the above. Hard to say m