Re: [QE-users] Assunto: Re: Difference in Fermi energy by increasing k-points

2021-12-29 Thread Hongyi Zhao
On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 5:22 AM Kazume NISHIDATE wrote: > > Dear Xavier > > > When I used the k-points 4x4x4 (SCF) and 8x8x8 (NSCF), the HOMO and > > EFermi were different, and using EFermi to subtract the values in the > > If the k-point mesh you selected covers the typical energy peaks of > the

Re: [QE-users] Assunto: Re: Difference in Fermi energy by increasing k-points

2021-12-29 Thread Kazume NISHIDATE
Dear Xavier > When I used the k-points 4x4x4 (SCF) and 8x8x8 (NSCF), the HOMO and > EFermi were different, and using EFermi to subtract the values in the If the k-point mesh you selected covers the typical energy peaks of the valence band maximum (VBM or the HOMO in your description) depends on

[QE-users] Assunto: Re: Difference in Fermi energy by increasing k-points

2021-12-29 Thread José Xavier via users
Dear Nishidate,Thank you for your answer. If I understood correctly, you are telling me to plot the DOS using the EFermi to subtract the energy (first column of the DOS file), and set it as the zero. Is it? When I used the k-points 4x4x4 (SCF) and 8x8x8 (NSCF), the HOMO and EFermi were

Re: [QE-users] Bug in GPU acceleration of QE7.0

2021-12-29 Thread Filippo Spiga
Dear Xiongyi, could you share a bit more about how you compile and run the calculation? It will be even better if you can you also share the problem (including input case, how you built and how you run) on the QE GitLab to track the bug properly. https://gitlab.com/QEF/q-e/-/issues Thank you