[QE-users] Difference between pw.x and cp.x for relax, ve-relax calculation

2022-04-06 Thread likejiang
Dear QE-Users, In QE 7.0, I noticed that the calculation choice for cp.x can also be 'relax', 'vc-relax', 'scf', and 'nscf' which are the key functions of pw.x. But the other parameters in cp.x are far less than the pw.x, for instance, it is known that K point cannot be set in cp.x. Could anyone

[QE-users] Symmetry dependent convergence

2022-04-06 Thread Franklin T Cerasoli via users
Hello, I've been using QE for several years and recently came across an interesting issue when try to converge certain large systems. Attached is a link to an inputfile for a 216 atom system. With QE-6.8 (also tested on v6.3), the structure converges only if nosym=.f. and noinv=.f.. There are

Re: [QE-users] Differences between projwfc.dat and atomic_proj.xml

2022-04-06 Thread Léo Gaspard
Sorry I forgot to add the files, they are attached in this mail (the pseudo are the SC pseudo from PseudoDojo with PBE functional). I noticed that it happens only for bands that are degenerate. Could it be that the program does a rotation to print the proj.dat.projwfc_up file and not for the

Re: [QE-users] [QE-Users]Bader charge analysis using USPP

2022-04-06 Thread Giovanni La Penna
Dear dr Anson Thomas, In the qe-7.0 version available to download from the quantum-espresso web site, there is a PP version that produces a reasonable all-electron density. Just use plot_num=24 in place of 0. Documentation and examples are not yet updated, sorry. Then, the cube-file can be used

Re: [QE-users] Problem with Band Structure Post-processing calculation

2022-04-06 Thread Jasleen Kaur via users
Thank you for pointing it out. I will definitely look into it. However, I am not sure if that is the cause for the problem as I am able to run the post-processing just fine for the system without SOC. Jasleen On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 2:14 PM Paolo Giannozzi wrote: > On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 3:02

Re: [QE-users] Problem with Band Structure Post-processing calculation

2022-04-06 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 3:02 PM Jasleen Kaur via users < users@lists.quantum-espresso.org> wrote: > Could you please look into this and let me know if I am missing anything. > you are missing something quite obvious: don't you see that there are N processes, each running on 1 processor? This

[QE-users] Problem with Band Structure Post-processing calculation

2022-04-06 Thread Jasleen Kaur via users
Dear All, I am trying to run the band structure calculation for Cr-Pt alloy with Spin-Orbit coupling. I was successful in running 'scf' and 'bands' calculations with pw.x. However, the bands.x calculation is not converging nor is it giving me any kind of an error. I have attached all the input

Re: [QE-users] Differences between projwfc.dat and atomic_proj.xml

2022-04-06 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
Please provide an example that can be reproduced of the discrepancies you observe Paolo On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 3:07 PM Léo Gaspard wrote: > Dear QuantumEspresso users and developers, > > > I am trying to parse the atomic_proj.xml file in order to get the > projections of the wavefunction on