Re: [QE-users] problems with DFT+U+V (No atom equivalent to r2 error)

2022-06-08 Thread Corina Urdaniz
Thank you very much ...works perfectly!!! Corina. IBS Center for Quantum Nanoscience Seoul, South Korea On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 2:22 PM Pietro Davide Delugas wrote: > This last issue has been fixed in the current release candidate: > > https://gitlab.com/QEF/q-e/-/tree/qe-7.1-rc2 > > Pietro

Re: [QE-users] problems with DFT+U+V (No atom equivalent to r2 error)

2022-06-08 Thread Pietro Davide Delugas
This last issue has been fixed in the current release candidate: https://gitlab.com/QEF/q-e/-/tree/qe-7.1-rc2 Pietro Il 9 giu 2022 6:54 AM, Corina Urdaniz ha scritto: Thank you very much for your quick answer and for your time. I read the paper carefully. Just as a comment, I tried the system

Re: [QE-users] problems with DFT+U+V (No atom equivalent to r2 error)

2022-06-08 Thread Corina Urdaniz
Thank you very much for your quick answer and for your time. I read the paper carefully. Just as a comment, I tried the system: an atom of V on mgo, and I called the oxygen below the V as O1, but it didn't work either with eps=5.d-6. ATOMIC_SPECIES V 50.9415 v_pbe_v1.4.uspp.F.UPF O1 15.999 O

Re: [QE-users] problems with DFT+U+V (No atom equivalent to r2 error)

2022-06-08 Thread Iurii TIMROV via users
Dear Corina, Please do not forget to indicate your affiliation. You are trying to model a V-O dimer, right? Note that DFT+U+V was designed for periodic solids. Also note that a virtual 3x3x3 supercell is created in DFT+U+V to find the indices of neighboring atoms to assign the inter-site Hubb