[QE-users] No IR vibrational peak

2022-11-27 Thread 홍장희
Hi, I was calculated ice cluster's vibration using ph.x. but no IR peaks appeared. I don't know the reason. here my input & output Normal modes for Wurtzite  &inputph   tr2_ph=1.0d-14,   prefix='ice_scf',   outdir='./out/'   epsil=.false.,   trans=.true.,   asr=.true.   fildyn='dmat.ice'  /

Re: [QE-users] Problem in vc-relax calculation with Hubbard U in magnetic system

2022-11-27 Thread Kazume NISHIDATE
Dear Thomas Brumme, I'm not familiar with the +U method and this is a general view. - One possibility is the difference in the relaxation route achieving the most stable state. In some cases, the system may be trapped in quasi stable state. Suppose that you get structure A in QE and struct

Re: [QE-users] Problem in vc-relax calculation with Hubbard U in magnetic system

2022-11-27 Thread Thomas Brumme
Hi Iurii, I'm working with Vivek on the structure - one question I would have is why is QE different from VASP? (and which solution is correct?) In VASP the relaxation is not restricted and since both codes use more or less the same theory, the difference might come from some details in the im

Re: [QE-users] Problem in vc-relax calculation with Hubbard U in magnetic system

2022-11-27 Thread Iurii TIMROV via users
> The output structure does not hold the monoclinic symmetry; Hubbard U should > help it achieve that. However, I do not get it despite using any Hubbard U. Maybe you can try to impose the monoclinic symmetry (ibrav = 12 or -12), apply +U, and use cell_dofree = "ibrav" during the vc-relax calcu