Re: [QE-users] Zero occupations of Hubbard levels

2023-02-09 Thread Iurii TIMROV via users
> Now I added J value too since U+J supports noncollinear calculation. But > vc-relax calculation gives 'forces in the DFT+U+J scheme are not implemented' > error. (Here I'm trying to apply self-consistent procedure for Hubbard and J > parameters) As you can see, it is not implemented > How ca

[QE-users] Ynt: Zero occupations of Hubbard levels

2023-02-09 Thread Mustafa Özgür
Hi Iurii, I used ultra soft pps from quantum espresso website. Scalar relativistic for 'vc-relax' - 'relax' and full relativistic 'scf' - 'nscf'. Problem is solved by removing 'lforcet' tag from nscf input. However It is not giving "eband, Ef (eV) = ** **" energy output anymore in nscf output f

[QE-users] Ph.D. position announcement

2023-02-09 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
A co-tutored Ph.D. position at Università di Udine (IT) and Université Paris-Saclay (FR) on "First principle quantum transport for an atomistic engineering of nanoscale devices and interfaces" is available. Details in the attachment Paolo -- Paolo Giannozzi, Dip. Scienze Matematiche Informatic