Dear Anirudh Adavi,
See section "Pseudopotentials" in q-e/Doc/Hubbard_input.pdf.
You need to add labels of the wavefunctions in the pseudopotential file (e.g.
label = "3d"). This is needed for the DFT+U code to work by knowing what is the
Hubbard manifold. Otherwise, you can try older version
Dear QE Developers
Note: I apologize for repeating the message. In the previous one the subject
was incomplete.
I am performing a geometric optimization (vc-relax) for a 2D material, using
the option "assume_isolated = '2D' " and "cell_dofree ="2Dxy" " ,
and I noticed that the forces do not con
Dear QE Developers
I am performing a geometric optimization (vc-relax) for a 2D material, using
the option "assume_isolated = '2D' " and "cell_dofree ="2Dxy" " ,
and I noticed that the forces do not converge, after 19 steps the forces have
not changed at all, which is unusual:
Tot
Hi Kazume,
thanks for the suggestion. I tried with an older version but gave the
same error. However, I solved it by changing the "exxdiv_treatment" to
'vcut_spherical' and it converged.
Rameswar
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 12:50 AM Kazume NISHIDATE
wrote:
>
> Dear Rameswar Bhattacharjee,
>
> > thes
Hello,
I am attempting to run some SCF calculations with QE on transition metal oxide
systems to generate orbitals for subsequent QMC. As such, I have been using the
ccECP and ccECP-soft pseudopotentials from https://pseudopotentiallibrary.org/.
However, adding a U correction to either the Mn-3
Hi Paolo,
Thank you for your answer’
Bands.x had caught my eye before but I did not notice how to make it output
transition dipole moments. How would one compute those?
Meanwhile I managed to indeed get hdf5 output. That’s great! If there is a
native way to obtain the values I want it’s prefer
I think code "bands.x" can compute dipole matrix elements.
About direct access to wavefunctions: the default fortran binary format
is basically unreadable except via the routines of QE. One may
optionally write hdf5 files that are much easier to read with external
utilities, though.
Paolo
O
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: [QE-users] Missing d orbital in projected band structure
of CaC6
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 10:15:26 +0200
From: Lorenzo Paulatto
Organization: CNRS
To: Bruce Wang
Hello Bruce.
You can see in hte input file (which is at the beginn
The "3d-1" field in 'config' means - in the rather questionable logic of
the atomic code - that the 3d orbitals are not bound. In fact the
pseudization energies for 3d have non-zero values (fourth column below):
3D 3 2 0.00 0.05 1.20 1.70 0.0
3D 3 2 0.00 1.00 1.20 1.70 0.0
The 3d s
Dear Giovanni
I've found this one into the psl-1.0.0 library.
cat > Ca.$fct-spn-rrkjus_psl.1.0.0.in << EOF
&input
title='Ca',
zed=20.,
rel=$nrel,
config='[Ar] 4s2 4p0 3d-1',
iswitch=3,
dft='$gfun'
/
&inputp
lpaw=.false.,
pseudotype=3,
file_pseudopw='Ca.$fct-spn-rrk
Dear Bruce,
if I'm not wrong you're using this pseudopotential:
http://pseudopotentials.quantum-espresso.org/upf_files/Ca.pbe-spn-rrkjus_psl.1.0.0.UPF
If you look inside you see that it has been generate with this valence
configuration:
nl pn l occ RcutRcut US E pseu
3S
Hi all,
New QE users here. I’ve used QE so far to compute band structures for crystals.
I am however very much interested in calculating the dipole matrix elements for
said crystals. Does QE have a module that allows one to do this? If so, how
would that work?
Moreover, I have read that it i
Dear Bruce (please sign always your posts to this forum with full name
and affiliation, we appreciate it)
You should add many more details (code version, list of simulations,
input and relevant parts of output, ...). From your post it is
impossible to understand what you have exactly done
Dear QE users and developers,
I am currently working on calculating the projected band structure of CaC6
using quantum espresso with GGA+UItrasoft pseudopotential
(Ca.pbe-spn-rrkjus_psl.1.0.0.UPF). However, I have encountered an issue with
obtaining the 3d orbital wavefunctions for Calcium.
I
With all due respect, it seems to me that trying to identify the mistakes, once
you know that there are some/several, would be a sign of respect to those who
spend lots of time helping others and to keep the project running. For free.
Every minute spent addressing questions that could have not b
Hi Paolo,
Thank you for your response. If you say where is bad syntax, I can
correct it and try to run.
Best regards,
On 7/24/23 18:23, Paolo Giannozzi wrote:
The input data you report contain several cases of bad syntax. Please
provide an input file with correct syntax, the output file and
16 matches
Mail list logo