Re: [QE-users] It is neccesary to make a vc-relax in each DFT U+V calculation?

2024-09-27 Thread ROBERT MIKHAIL GUZMAN ARELLANO via users
Thanks a lot for your response. I was reading the paper that you recommended to me and I notice that your U and V values are positive. I am practicing the DFT U + V in graphane (graphene -C- completely hydrogenated - 4 atoms in the unit cell) with the objective to calculate U and V values of carb

[QE-users] Error in q2r.x

2024-09-27 Thread Md. Jahid Hasan Sagor
Hi QE experts, I want to plot the phonon dispersion of Au. I successfully ran pw.x and ph.x. (I am sharing the input files as follows). However, while running q2r.x, I have found the error " nc already filled: wrong q grid or wrong nr". Would you please see the inputs where I have made any mistake

Re: [QE-users] It is neccesary to make a vc-relax in each DFT U+V calculation?

2024-09-27 Thread Timrov Iurii
Dear Robert, Please have a look at this paper: https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.103.045141 Yes, generally, one should also redo the vc-relax calculations using updated U and V values using DFT+U+V. But if, for example, one wants to work with the fixed geometry (e.g. the e