Re: [QE-users] Errors during make pw

2021-06-21 Thread Asad Mahmood
Thanks, Is there a way I can modify any file in the directory to remove this error? Asad Mahmood University of Nebraska-Lincoln From: users on behalf of Paolo Giannozzi Sent: Monday, June 21, 2021 5:39 AM To: Quantum ESPRESSO users Forum Subject: Re: [QE

Re: [QE-users] dipfield

2018-11-13 Thread Asad Mahmood
on't know if this will work at all. > > So, either dipfield = .true. or assume_isolated ='2d' > > Thomas > > On 11/13/18 11:45, Asad Mahmood wrote: > > Thanks Thomas for reply. So I need to include both flags(i.e dipfielf = > .true and assume_isolated ='2d' ) in relax or s

Re: [QE-users] dipfield

2018-11-12 Thread Asad Mahmood
Sorry, I forgot to add affiliation. Asad Mahmood Reseach Assistant Q.A.U, Islamabad Pakistan On Tue, Nov 13, 2018, 12:38 PM Asad Mahmood Hi, > > I have a hexagonal graphene(or any other) monolayer and I hydrogenate(or > flourinate, etc.) on the top surface only (single sided). Is t

[QE-users] dipfield

2018-11-12 Thread Asad Mahmood
Hi, I have a hexagonal graphene(or any other) monolayer and I hydrogenate(or flourinate, etc.) on the top surface only (single sided). Is there need to use flag dipfield = .true ? What is benefit or disadvantage of using this flag for optimization of L.C or bond length? I am using 20 angstrom

Re: [QE-users] Projected DOS with Spin-Orbit Coupling ; users Digest, Vol 135, Issue 3

2018-10-04 Thread Asad Mahmood
That makes sense. Thank you so much for such a detailed reply. On Thu, Oct 4, 2018, 2:47 AM Lucas Nicolás Lodeiro Moraga < lucas.lode...@ug.uchile.cl> wrote: > Hi, I have never done that calculation in QE, but i think i understand the > colums, by spectroscopic sense. > If the SOC is on, you

[QE-users] Projected DOS with Spin-Orbit Coupling

2018-10-03 Thread Asad Mahmood
) mean? Clearly , j1.5 and j0.5 are due to L+/S and L-S respectively. *Q#2:* How can we think of px, py and pz from these new labelled files? Regards, Asad Mahmood, Research Assistant Department of Physics Q.A.U, Islamabad, Pakistan ___ users mailing list

Re: [QE-users] Finding Parity of Different Bands in Topological Insulator

2018-09-28 Thread Asad Mahmood
No one replies :-( I also write my affiliation now at the end of email. Still no reply Asad Mahmood, Research Student, Department of Physics, QAU, Islamabad, Pakistan On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 4:26 PM Asad Mahmood wrote: > Here is the input file: > > > calcul

Re: [QE-users] Finding Parity of Different Bands in Topological Insulator

2018-09-28 Thread Asad Mahmood
used 0.5 0 0 but it is xk=( -0.5, 0.28868, 0.0 ). Moreover, I get the same result for M2 and M3 (which should not happen because then Z2 = 0 which contradicts the dedfinitions of TI) Please help. On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 4:19 PM Asad Mahmood wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I

[QE-users] Finding Parity of Different Bands in Topological Insulator

2018-09-27 Thread Asad Mahmood
symmetry which implies that I can find parity eigen values at different bands(then I can find Z2 Topological Invariant using parity eigen values). My question is: How can we obtain parities (or directly Z2 values, if possible) using Quantum Espresso for a given band diagram? Regards, Asad Mahmood

Re: [QE-users] Relax Calculation anomalous result

2018-09-17 Thread Asad Mahmood
Dear Thomas, I did not include dipole correction. In fact I never heard about it and new 2D cutoff technique. Asad Mahmood, Physics Department Quaid e Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan On Mon, Sep 17, 2018, 2:02 PM Thomas Brumme wrote: > Hi Asad, > > did you consider to include

[QE-users] Relax Calculation anomalous result

2018-09-17 Thread Asad Mahmood
Hi, I did relax calculation for monolayer Germanene (honeycomb) with about 20 angstrom vacuum between two layers. I did it for single sided hydrogenation. Final relaxed coordinates gave me different values of Ge-H bond length. One was 1.49 angstrom while other was 1.52 angstrom. Buckling length

[QE-users] Z2 topological invariant

2018-09-08 Thread Asad Mahmood
Hi, I am working with some 2D material and putting biaxial strain in it. At some particular value of lattice constant the band structure shows band inversion at Gamma point. I want to calculate Z2 topological invariant. Please help me in computing it. Thanks, Asad Mahmood QAU Islamabad, Pakistan

Re: [QE-users] Spin Polarized + Spin Orbit Coupling combined error

2018-09-01 Thread Asad Mahmood
ble. Kind > regards > > -- > Lorenzo Paulatto > Written on a virtual keyboard with real fingers > > On Fri, 31 Aug 2018, 23:11 Asad Mahmood, wrote: > >> Please reply anyone who may know the solution to this issue. It is very >> urgent and I am unable to fi

Re: [QE-users] Spin Polarized + Spin Orbit Coupling combined error

2018-08-31 Thread Asad Mahmood
Please reply anyone who may know the solution to this issue. It is very urgent and I am unable to find it anywhere. Anxiously waiting. On Thu, Aug 30, 2018, 11:03 PM Asad Mahmood wrote: > Hi, > > In trying to compute spin-polarized band structure along-with turning on > spin or

Re: [QE-users] Error while 'relax' calculations in QE v.5.2.0

2018-08-31 Thread Asad Mahmood
ween C and > fortran, affecting it. I have never ever seen such problem. > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 8:08 PM, Asad Mahmood > wrote: > >> Thanks for the reply. I tried "mpirun -np 8 pw.x -in relax.in" but still >> the same error. >> Another thing I would l

[QE-users] K resolved DOS

2018-08-30 Thread Asad Mahmood
one of you guys to how to plot these type of files to get useful information (in gnuplot)? Any help would be appreciated. Regards Asad Mahmood, Physics Department, QAU, Islamabad, Pakistan ___ users mailing list users@lists.quantum-espresso.org https

Re: [QE-users] Error while 'relax' calculations in QE v.5.2.0

2018-08-30 Thread Asad Mahmood
t 10:58 PM, Paolo Giannozzi wrote: > There is no error in your data, but "reading input from standard data" > suggests that you are doing something like "pw.x < input_file". Try "pw.x > -in input_file" instead. > > Paolo > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2

[QE-users] Spin Polarized + Spin Orbit Coupling combined error

2018-08-30 Thread Asad Mahmood
Hi, In trying to compute spin-polarized band structure along-with turning on spin orbit coupling for hydrogenated silicene. For this I included the following lines in input file: nspin = 2 starting_magnetization = 0.7 noncolin = .true lspinorb = .true But I get an error: Program PWSCF

[QE-users] Error while 'relax' calculations in QE v.5.2.0

2018-08-30 Thread Asad Mahmood
Hi there, I am trying to perform a 'relax' calculation for a supercell containing 16 atoms. I checked it carefully. The error appears in output file : Program PWSCF v.5.2.0 starts on 30Aug2018 at 22:15:48 This program is part of the open-source Quantum ESPRESSO suite for quantum