Re: [QE-users] Got Different fermi energy from qe as compared to published result (vasp)

2018-07-25 Thread Aurab Chakrabarty
Are the energy levels in dos relative to the Fermi level also different? Can you set the Fermi levels of both cases to zero and check that the dos don't match? What do you refer by dft d3, is it the van der Waals correction? Best, Aurab On Thu 26 Jul, 2018, 10:59 Priya Shrivastava,

[Pw_forum] Help!

2010-11-18 Thread Aurab
Parallelism chapter of QE user guide for detailed instructions. Many regards, Aurab On 16 November 2010 05:58, Suman Dhayal wrote: > hi, > > I configured and compiled the code but when I run example01, it runs for Si > but not for Al. It gives me a segmentation fault error and then says exit

[Pw_forum] Too large susceptibility in NMR/ g-tensor calculations using GIPAW

2010-10-17 Thread Aurab
, Aurab -- =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=* Aurab D. Chakrabarty Room 2.22 The Lloyd Institute School of Physics Trinity College Dublin Dublin 2 Ireland Telephone: +353-1-896-8453 *=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=* -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http

[Pw_forum] Calculating g-tensor using gipaw

2010-10-01 Thread Aurab
Dear Apsi, Thank you for the reply. I checked my pseudopotential files and yes you are right! The core radii cutoff has been read zero! Is it just a bug in the ld1.x code or there is particular reason behind. I can't think of any. Thanks a ton, Aurab On 30 September 2010 14:58, Ari P Seit

[Pw_forum] Calculating g-tensor using gipaw

2010-09-30 Thread Aurab
7; isolve = 0 iverbosity = 1 file_reconstruction(1) = 'Zn.pbe-gipaw.recon' file_reconstruction(2) = 'O.pbe-gipaw.recon' q_gipaw = 0.01 / Regards, Aurab D. Chakrabarty Trinity College Dublin *=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=* -- next part --