vasp like method was giving some n+q error. DOn't know if that has been
fixed in 5.2.1. But to calculate bandgap you can add enough conduction
bands and use occupations='fixed' that gives you highest occupied and
lowest unoccupied level in the out file.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 4:43 PM, plgong wr
T approximation levels seem a bit
> confused...
> You may want to read these enlightening articles:
>
> Cohen, A. J.; Mori-Sànchez, P.; Yang, W. Science 2008, 321, 792.
> Mori-Sànchez, P.; Cohen, A. J.; Yang, W. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100,
> 146401.
>
> HTH
> Giuseppe
>
>
Hi,
I am doing Silicon bulk calculations to determine the valence band level
w.r.t average electrostatic potential. When HSE is used I am getting
valence band maximum closer to the average electrostatic potential by 0.3eV
which is significant. HSE06 should improve conduction band levels, why is
it
The ecutwfc required for NiSi2 is >80Ry which more that 1000eV. Isn't it
bit higher? From the literature 400eV-600eV is suggestive.
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Paolo Giannozzi
wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 11:13 AM, DHIRENDRA VAIDYA <
> dhirendra22121...@gmail.
QE version, I cannot reproduce your
> problem (that error message should NEVER appear). Note however that
> - 40 Ry for Ni HGH is way too low, and
> - There are no atomic wavefunctions in the HGH pseudopotential files, so
> you cannot compute the PDOS
>
> Paolo
>
> On Wed, Sep 30,
Hi,
I am trying to plot density of state for Nickel Silicide.
I am getting this error
Error in routine descla_init (2):
wrong value for computed nrcx
What is it?
My script is belo
fname=NiSi2_Si
OutDir=NiSi2_Si
PREFIX=NiSi2_Si
cat > $fname.scf.in < $fname.scf.out
mkdir pdos
ca
Hi,
As HSE doesn't allow nscf calculations, its not possible to plot a
bandstructure along high symmetry lines. I am wondering if I can use
wannier90 post processing after HSE-scf calculations?
Can anyone please provide an expert comment?
Thanks,
Dhirendra
Is PAW+HSE now available in QE 5.2?
--
--
Dhirendra
___
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
ld quite different results no?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Galvin
> --
> *From:* DHIRENDRA VAIDYA
> *Sent:* 22 May 2015 08:45
>
> *To:* PWSCF Forum
> *Subject:* Re: [Pw_forum] Silicon HSE Problem
>
> Hi Galvin,
>
> Checkout the units
rry for the novice questions),
> and thanks again for your reply.
>
>
>
>Galvin,
> University College London
>--
> *From:* DHIRENDRA VAIDYA
> *Sent:* 20 May 2015 20:40
>
> *To:* PWSCF Forum
> *Subject:* Re: [Pw_forum] Si
Hi Galvin,
I am also looking at HSE bandstructure calculaitons, mainly for Group IV
elements from semiconductore point of view. I get from PWSCF forum that its
difficult to obtain the bandstructure using HSE, but bandgap might be easy
to obtain. Try this,
In scf calculations add, nbnd (=8 if using
Hi all
I am trying to use GGA+U in PWSCF. A similar approach as mentioned in
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3625939
Ge, Sn and Si are not listed in flib/set_hubbard_l.f90 and src/tabd.f90.
Can anyone suggest the 'hubbard_l' value to be set in set_hubbard_l.f90 and
'hubbard_occ' in tabd.f90 for Ge, S
endorff-Platz 1, Room 1.07
> D-06120 Halle/Saale, Germany
> Tel.: ++49 345 5525460
>
>
> Am 17.05.2015 um 12:00 schrieb pw_forum-requ...@pwscf.org:
>
> Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 05:29:29 +0530
> From: DHIRENDRA VAIDYA
> Subject: [Pw_forum] Si B
Hi,
So far PWSCF provides little help in Silicon bandstructure using HSE. But
from PWSCF forum it is clear to me now that in HSE nscf calculations cannot
be performed. The VASP method of zero weights on KPOINTS doesn't work due
to an error ' k+q is not an s*k'. I had some success in using Wannier9
ing to
> enter a password?
>
> On Jul 2, 2013, at 2:52 PM, DHIRENDRA VAIDYA
> wrote:
>
> Dear PW_forum community,
>
> I am new to Quantum Espresso and I am trying to instal QE on our institute
> cluster. Compilers are installed in some non-standard directory and care
for me.
--
Thanks a lot,
Dhirendra Vaidya,
IIT Bombay
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://pwscf.org/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20130703/df9df993/attachment.html
16 matches
Mail list logo