ue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Lorenzo Paulatto
wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:29:23 +0200, Laurence Marks
> wrote:
>> A personal opinion: saturating "bonds" with hydrogen is bad science,
>> just as "fixing atoms" is also bad science. These are relics of the
&g
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
--
Laurence Marks
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
MSE Rm 2036 Cook Hall
2220 N Campus Drive
Northwestern University
Evansto
int
> calculation.
>
> --
> Best regards, Max Popov
> Ph.D. student
> Materials center Leoben (MCL), Leoben, Austria.
>
> ___
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
&g
Is this currently in the distribution?
--
Laurence Marks
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
MSE Rm 2036 Cook Hall
2220 N Campus Drive
Northwestern University
Evanston, IL 60208, USA
Tel: (847) 491-3996 Fax: (847) 491-7820
email: L-marks at northwestern dot edu
Web
Type: configure.ac:306 (not 30).
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Laurence Marks
wrote:
> Agreed. One could (maybe) write a macro for this but it would be way
> too specialized. Just removing the over-ride should enable the user to
> specify it; most cluster sysadmins should have this
55 AM, Paolo Giannozzi
wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 16:13 -0500, Laurence Marks wrote:
>
>> Another quick one: line 1766 of install/configure.ac nulls out
>> scalapack_libs and the lines below look like they are special tests,
>> which seems to be inconsistent with line
H, error from Exc & Vxc, more than 0.01 eV per atom.
On Apr 13, 2011 2:47 AM, "Stefano de Gironcoli" wrote:
> I don't think you'll need so many digits...
> anyhow if you add a few digits in the output and you tighten the
> conv_thr to less than 1.d-10
> the numbers you'll get should be sel
ot; wrote:
> It has been there for some time, didn't seem to have any relevant effect.
> do you have evidence of the contrary?
> stefano
>
> On 04/11/2011 05:25 PM, Laurence Marks wrote:
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Another question if I may. From the looks of PW/mix_rho.
AM, Laurence Marks
wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> Another question if I may. From the looks of PW/mix_rho.f90 you do not
> use the weights in the Johnson paper, just a straight inverse of
> betamix (what would be called Y^T Y in the optimization literature) at
> lines 289-295? Hav
during the scf iterations -- is it used elsewhere?
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Stefano de Gironcoli
wrote:
> in my previous ?post
>
> reminder -> remainder
>
> stefano
>
> On 04/11/2011 11:57 AM, Stefano de Gironcoli wrote:
>> dear Laurence Marks
>>
>
For completeness, added proper comments.
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Laurence Marks
wrote:
> A very minor bug that you probably known: some of the routines in
> S3DE/iotk/src have lines such as "# 1 "iotk_write_interf.spp" ". Most
> sensible preprocessors wi
oblems I might want to do some.)
--
Professor Laurence Marks
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
MSE Rm 2036 Cook Hall
2220 N Campus Drive
Northwestern University
Evanston, IL 60208, USA
Tel: (847) 491-3996 Fax: (847) 491-7820
email: L-marks at northwestern dot edu
Web: www.numis.northwe
13 matches
Mail list logo