[Pw_forum] [***SPAM*** Score/Req: 10.00/5.0] Re: (no subject)

2012-07-03 Thread Sonu Kumar
I am sorry for asking the question at inappropriate/unsuitable thread. == Sonu Kumar Phd Student,Physics Department Indian Institute of Technology ,Delhi-110016, India web:-http://www.iitd.ac.in/ == On Mon, Jul

[Pw_forum] [***SPAM*** Score/Req: 10.00/5.0] Re: (no subject)

2012-07-02 Thread Sonu Kumar
Dear all QE users and Prof. Guido Fratesi, I have a doubt... Electron localization function calculations does not make much sense when using ultra-soft pseudopotentials. Is it true? although USPP takes into account the charge removal due to smoothness of pseudo states by adding augmentation char

[Pw_forum] [***SPAM*** Score/Req: 10.00/5.0] Re: (no subject)

2012-07-02 Thread Yavar Taghipour Azar
Dear Guido, thanks for your consideration and good comments -Original Message- From: Guido Fratesi To: pw_forum at pwscf.org Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 14:39:11 +0200 Subject: [***SPAM*** Score/Req: 10.00/5.0] Re: [Pw_forum] (no subject) Dear Yavar, you are going to miss the contributi

[Pw_forum] [***SPAM*** Score/Req: 10.00/5.0] Re: (no subject)

2012-07-02 Thread Guido Fratesi
Dear Sonu, the thread was about the local density of states, not the ELF. Guido On 07/02/2012 03:12 PM, Sonu Kumar wrote: > Dear all QE users and Prof. Guido Fratesi, > > I have a doubt... > Electron localization function calculations does not make > much sense when using ultra-soft pseudopotentia